The mutually
recognized authority of Scripture served well in the debates with the papacy, but the Reformers and their successors never did a terribly good job of saying why they received what they received from the ancient church.
Not exact matches
Nathaniel was much bothered by some
of Jesus» pronouncements which seemed to detract from the
authority of the
recognized Hebrew
scriptures.
Anglicans do not
recognize a single
authority, like the Pope or the Bible, but instead
recognize the complimentary roles
of Scripture, reason, tradition, and experience.
«When we take the phrase «the
authority of Scripture» out of its suitcase,» Wright says, «then, we recognize that it can have Christian meaning only if we are referring to scripture's authority in a delegated or mediated sense from that which God himself possesses and that which Jesus possesses as the risen Lord and Son of God, the Immanue
Scripture» out
of its suitcase,» Wright says, «then, we
recognize that it can have Christian meaning only if we are referring to
scripture's authority in a delegated or mediated sense from that which God himself possesses and that which Jesus possesses as the risen Lord and Son of God, the Immanue
scripture's
authority in a delegated or mediated sense from that which God himself possesses and that which Jesus possesses as the risen Lord and Son
of God, the Immanuel.»
The only intelligible solution to this problem would seem to be to admit the relative religious value, based on experience,
of each group's
scriptures for its own corporate life, but to
recognize that no book has final
authority.
Evangelicals have increasingly
recognized the necessity
of describing
Scripture's
authority and trustworthiness in terms
of its intention.
The importance
of recognizing the
authority of multiple Biblical witnesses must be maintained if interpreters are to avoid twisting the Biblical record to support outside aims.37 Paul Holmer is correct in warning against evangelicals treating the
Scripture as if it were a literary and metaphysical and casual gloss on a literal and systematic structure that it otherwise hides.
The Faculty and Trustee Committee at Fuller Seminary, for example, which investigated Paul Jewett's book Man as Male and Female
recognized Jewett's commitment to the full
authority of Scripture, as well as his important contribution to a theology
of women, even while it challenged his handling
of the evidence.
So the
Scriptures have a
recognized sacred
authority, a canonicity, based on their close association with the sacredness
of the Christ.
By about 200 AD, there was a list
of about 20 New Testament books which were
recognized by most church leaders as having the
authority and accuracy
of Scripture.
The illustration suggests that he should study the theological resources
of Scripture, history, and doctrine; and study also, with equal seriousness, what he knows
of the related meanings from his own
authority of both traditional and contemporary experience; and how to
recognize the authenticity
of the dialogue, both historical and contemporary, be - tween God and man and the dependence
of each on the other.
Webber writes: «In the first place evangelicals should
recognize that a doctrine
of inerrancy is not a sufficient basis for
authority... evangelicals should
recognize that the key to interpreting
Scripture is the «rule
of faith.»»
According to Wright, «When we take the phrase «the
authority of Scripture» out of its suitcase, then, we recognize that it can have Christian meaning only if we are referring to scripture's authority in a delegated or mediated sense from that which God himself possesses and that which Jesus possesses as the risen Lord and Son of God, the
Scripture» out
of its suitcase, then, we
recognize that it can have Christian meaning only if we are referring to
scripture's authority in a delegated or mediated sense from that which God himself possesses and that which Jesus possesses as the risen Lord and Son of God, the
scripture's
authority in a delegated or mediated sense from that which God himself possesses and that which Jesus possesses as the risen Lord and Son
of God, the Immanuel.
He could cite proof texts on occasion in debate with Sadducees or Pharisees, and it is entirely probable that from his youth he had read and deeply pondered the
Scriptures for himself; but his ideas were not arrived at by deductive analysis
of texts or compilation
of pronouncements by
recognized «
authorities.»