In most of Canada, it doesn't appear that there is
any recognized common law duty to provide a letter of reference.
It did consider whether to
recognize a common law duty to abide by the safeguarding provision, but held that it should not do so based on policy grounds, including the need to defer to the comprehensive administrative remedial regime provided for by the legislature.
Not exact matches
Moreover, the Supreme Court of Canada recently held in Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 that «It is appropriate to
recognize a new
common law duty that applies to all contracts as a manifestation of the general organizing principle of good faith: a
duty of honest performance, which requires the parties to be honest with each other in relation to the performance of their contractual obligations.»
The court also referred to a unanimous judgment from the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), in which the SCC
recognized a general organizing principle of good faith contractual performance — i.e., that there is a
common law duty which applies to all contracts to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations.
Stage one: does the action in question fall within the general scope of a police
duty imposed by statute or
recognized at
common law?
In another recent decision of the SCC, Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, the Court
recognized a new
common law contractual
duty: the
duty of honest performance.
With respect to whether the court should
recognize a new
common law duty of honesty in contractual performance - under the broad umbrella of the organizing principle of good faith performance of contracts Justice Cromwell held that the Court should.
Justice Cromwell cited three reasons for his decision that Canadian
common law should
recognize a contractual
duty to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations:
Recognizing a
duty of honest performance flowing directly from the
common law organizing principle of good faith is a modest, incremental step.
c. Inclusion of a NAFTA Indigenous Peoples» Chapter that would work along the lines of these sections of the Trans - Pacific Partnership, but that would replace mention of the Treaty of Waitangi with reference to s. 35 of Canada's Constitution Act, 1982, the mandated Supreme Court of Canada
duty to consult and accommodate Indigenous concerns, and to
recognize Aboriginal Title as part of the
common law as it stands in Canada.
Under the umbrella of the
duty of good faith, the Supreme Court also
recognized a new
common law contractual
duty: the
duty to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations.
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew significantly evolves the
common law of contract by
recognizing a general
common law duty of good faith contractual performance, and... [more] Full article
R. v. MacDonald, 2014 SCC 3 (34914) Two stages: the court must ask whether the action falls within the general scope of a police
duty imposed by statute or
recognized at
common law; if the answer is affirmative, the court must inquire into whether the action constitutes a justifiable exercise of powers associated with the
duty.
... The
duty of commitment to the client's cause has been
recognized by the Court as a distinct element of the broader
common law duty of loyalty and thus unquestionably is a legal principle:...