Sentences with phrase «red team exercise»

Since a red team exercise will immediately be tied to the administration it might as well embrace the resources the administration can offer, it can remain politically segregated by nature of how it conducts itself and though proper preemptive branding, make it known for starters that dissenting red team scientists are among the 97 % who believe humans have contributed some towards GW.
http://www.cfact.org/2017/07/03/teacher-testimonials-reveal-rampant-alarmism/ A red team exercise would certainly help by making the debate official.
Do not reject a red team exercise because you fear it will show your weaknesses; rather, be pleased that it should make you part of a better group.
If this red team exercise had been conducted under the Obama administration, it would be very clear who is «red» and who is «blue».
Would that be a good model for an EPA Red Team exercise on the topic?
I rather fear for the success of a red team exercise on climate research generally because some potential participants have hubris dominating good science.
On the contrary, both climate scientists and advocates should see opportunity in a red team exercise.
A properly - done red team exercise could both elevate the status of climate science in the Trump administration and among Republicans, and reset how we approach climate science as a nation.
Having listened with great respect, but some puzzlement to Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT's cogent expression of his views on global warming, two public spirited and authentically skeptical graduates of that institution opted a few years ago to fund a Red Team exercise of their own.
A red team exercise would need to go over all work performed by IPCC, an impossible task that even the totipotent current administration of the US of A could not undertake within any reasonable budget and time frame (even if reason is not its preferred weapon these days).
There are many pitfalls in establishing and conducting a successful and useful red team exercise.
But such a change is a much bigger challenge than a simple red team exercise.
As this by law requires comment and input, a natural blue team / red team exercise.
There is no reason why the Red Team exercise report can not be an additional volume.
The point is that there are a lot of choices to be made if there is going to be a Red Team exercise.
Holdren argued the scientific peer - review process already acts as a check on bad science, further arguing a red team exercise is a «right - wing» plot against climate science.
There is an opportunity to steer the proposed red team exercise in a useful direction.
The strongest red team exercises have buy - in from all parties and give the red team resources to perform original analysis along a set of critical questions.

Not exact matches

The Heartland Institute — the right - wing think tank that, after years of defending big tobacco through the lens of «smokers» rights,» has become a leading proponent of climate change denial — included Manuel on a spreadsheet of 205 scientists and economists submitted to the EPA in May for a planned red team - blue team exercise to debate the threat posed by climate change.
The meeting included «about 40 climate scientists, economists, lawyers, and other experts to discuss the possible creation by the Trump administration of a Red Team - Blue Team exercise on climate change,» he wrote.
On April 20, the day before the March for Science protest in Washington, D.C., New York University physicist Steve Koonin published an op - ed in The Wall Street Journal calling for a red - team, blue - team exercise to «put the «consensus» to the test, and improve public understanding, through an open, adversarial process.»
calling for a red - team, blue - team exercise to «put the «consensus» to the test, and improve public understanding, through an open, adversarial process.»
«EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's proposal for a Red Team - Blue Team exercise is vague, probably would not be effective, and is unlikely to come about,» Bast wrote in the email published last week by E&E News that summarized a late September meeting at the group's headquarters just outside of Chicago.
«EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's proposal for a Red Team - Blue Team exercise is vague, probably would not be effective, and is unlikely to come about,» Bast wrote in the email published last week by
«EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's proposal for a Red Team - Blue Team exercise is vague, probably would not be effective, and is unlikely to come about,» Heartland CEO Joseph Bast wrote in an email last week that summarized a Sept. 28 meeting at the group's headquarters just outside of Chicago.
My recommendation is that climate scientists who do NOT have a vested interest in the 2007 IPCC report and the USA CCSP reports, [including] those who are labeled as «skeptics», be commissioned to write a report evaluating the science of those reports (a «red team» exercise).
Let's hope that this Reds Team plan goes forward without political interference — as a scientific exercise — and the world gets a proper push of the RESET button on Climate Science as a whole — something must be done to shake the field loose from the Enforced Consensus that is preventing real scientific progress.
What is needed is clarification of objectives and concerns from the Trump administration, the administrative framework for the exercise including selection of team members, and then the red team itself needs to decide how to frame the problem and their approach.
I don't know if the skeptics have reached that level of realization yet, so it is a critical first step to debate in any exercise for a red team.
The idea for red team, blue team climate debates originated with Steven Koonin, a physicist at New York University... Mr. Koonin in April wrote an op - ed in The Wall Street Journal calling for using the military - style exercise — in which one team attacks and another defends — to test the robustness of climate change science...
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, Department of Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and others are calling for a red - team / blue - team (RT / BT) exercise to resolve differences of opinion regarding the science of global climate change.
An op - ed article by Koonin in the Wall Street Journal in April was the inspiration for the plan by EPA's Pruitt, first reported in late June by ClimateWire, to develop an adversarial «red team — blue team» exercise to probe climate change conclusions.
The Heartland Institute held closed door meetings to identify candidates for EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's «red team» exercise on climate change, an email from Joe Bast revealed.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z