The reference to «clean coal» was somewhat unclear in this context, because clean coal refers to attempts to recapture carbon released when coal is burnt or to otherwise
reduce coal pollution during the combustion process.
Not exact matches
The federal emissions standard is estimated to
reduce carbon
pollution equivalent to 134
coal power plants burning annually and save drivers $ 1,650 per vehicle through fuel savings according to the coalition that includes Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington.
THE FACTS: Clean
coal covers a range of technologies, some already in use, to
reduce pollution.
«As the Alberta Electricity System Operator has noted,
coal - fired power with carbon capture and storage is a far more expensive option to
reduce carbon
pollution compared to using natural gas, wind, solar and hydro power.
Alberta's electricity producers are planning to build new natural - gas - fired plants to replace a few aging
coal plants — a move that will
reduce carbon emissions and air
pollution that comes with
coal.
New Chinese hydro, nuclear, wind and solar are also significantly curtailing
coal power generation, driven not only by energy security and climate concerns but also by efforts to
reduce local
pollution.
The state is taking the Trump administration to court for not taking steps to
reduce air
pollution from predominantly
coal - burning states upwind that is causing chronic smog in metropolitan New York City.
«
Reducing carbon
pollution from electric power plants is a good start, but the goal must be phasing out
coal, oil, and natural gas as our energy sources,» said Howie Hawkins, Green candidate for Governor of New York (http://www.howiehawkins.org).
All to
reduce the dependence on — and the
pollution from — burning
coal.
That sulfur dioxide market, run by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has
reduced sulfur dioxide levels by 40 percent since 1992 by allowing companies to buy and sell the right to emit the acid - rain forming
pollution from
coal - burning plants, which has increased the acidity of lake waters throughout the region.
Another measure, the federal Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule, will require still more expensive controls on
coal plants in the Midwest and South to
reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions that travel across state lines, creating ozone and fine particle
pollution downwind.
The setup is part of an experiment aimed at testing an unusual water
pollution control scheme that uses gypsum, a waste product from
coal - fired power plants, to
reduce nutrient runoff from farms.
And compact fluorescent bulbs actually
reduce the mercury
pollution from the single largest U.S. source:
coal - fired power plants.
A host of factors determine the role of electric and hybrid cars in
reducing greenhouse gas
pollution, such as whether
coal is their ultimate fuel source.
The study also found that, although transmitting
coal power was slightly more effective at
reducing air
pollution impacts than simply replacing old
coal power plants with newer, cleaner ones in the east, both
coal scenarios had approximately the same carbon emissions.
The topping cycle
reduces the amount of
pollution produced when
coal is burnt and also narrows the gap in efficiency between
coal and gas - fired stations (Technology, 1 February 1992).
Cleaner
coal - burning technologies would
reduce emissions not only of greenhouse gases but also of soot and other by - products that cause local and regional
pollution — and they could prove to be easier or less expensive to implement.
A 2009 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that efforts to
reduce fine particle
pollution from automobiles, diesel engines, steel mills and
coal - fired power plants have added between four and eight months to the average American's life expectancy in recent years.
And industry leaders have focused recently on ways to impose cleaner
coal technologies, including at a major conference in Delhi earlier this month featuring high - level government and industry leaders focusing on
coal gasification, carbon capture and storage, upgrades and other measures to improve efficiency and
reduce pollution.
Despite the ads» claims, an analysis by the Center of American Progress determined that ACCCE's companies spend relatively few dollars conducting research on carbon capture and storage, the most promising clean
coal technology to
reduce global warming
pollution from
coal - fired power plants.
Meanwhile,
coal production fell by a record 231Mtoe (5.9 %), as massive output declines continued in the US and China worked to
reduce overcapacity and combat air
pollution.
·
Coal - or gas - fired systems with carbon capture and storage (CCS)
reduce GHG emissions, but increase other
pollution problems by 5 - 80 per cent, and create higher human health and environmental impacts.
I also note that if Asia (particularly China) converts its many existing
coal - fired power plants to methane (from hydrofracking) over the next few decades, then the air
pollution in this part of the world will likely be
reduced, which would further increase radiative forcing on the Earth.
my conclusion: as far as
coal is concerned, we should be focusing on continuing to
reduce so2 and particulate
pollution — and ignoring co2 completely.
Most if not all of these plants will not take advantage of newly developed but expensive clean
coal technology to
reduce sulfate emissions.Currently, the Clean Air Act here in the US has been revised and is weaker, not stronger, with respect to upgrading power plants to install
pollution control equipment.
In addition, using
coal in large centralized plants dramatically
reduces the burning of fuel wood and waste that causes enormous indoor air
pollution in developing nations.
More on
pollution levels and control measures Find out the State of Your Air BEST Battery Program Aims to
Reduce Lead Battery Poisoning in Asia Green Glossary: Superfund Huge Drop in Chinese Birth Defects After Local
Coal Plant Closes
I helped pass the Maryland Healthy Air Act, which is
reducing dangerous
pollution from Maryland's
coal - fired power plants.
The efforts to
reduce air
pollution in China range from the seemingly minor — asking residents to refrain from using
coal stoves and furnaces in their homes — to the massive — scaling back steel production capacity by an additional 50 million tons.
The plan sets a goal to
reduce the state's
coal - driven power generation, which is responsible for dangerous
pollution such as mercury, soot and carbon dioxide, and calls for investment in renewable energy and energy conservation.
«For example, adopting best - in - Canada policies on renewable energy, staged phase - out of
coal power and pricing carbon
pollution in Saskatchewan and Alberta would be three times more effective in
reducing carbon
pollution than current policies.
... Cutting local air
pollution from, say
coal, can also
reduce carbon emissions that cause warming.»
[iii] Toronto Sun, Shutdown of
coal plants raised electricity rates, failed to
reduce pollution: Report, January 17, 2017, http://m.torontosun.com/2017/01/17/shutdown-of-
coal-plants-raised-electricity-rates-failed-to-
reduce-
pollution-report
«Closing
coal power plants is not just an important step towards
reducing CO2 emissions, it's also crucial to
reduce the health - harming air
pollution that's suffocating our cities.
If the U.K. sold its shale gas both domestically and abroad to replace
coal, it could
reduce local air
pollution significantly and
reduce global carbon emissions by 170 megatons.
With
coal out of their energy mix, Ontarians have
reduced carbon
pollution by the equivalent of 7 million cars.
However, we still have lots to do locally to clean up our air and
reduce our carbon
pollution from area
coal plants.
For the short term, carbon pricing and more stringent
pollution control regulations may be used to
reduce emissions, minimise local air
pollution, and limit and ultimately phase out generation from subcritical
coal - fired power stations.
The Sierra Club threw its full weight behind a fear - mongering campaign in Ohio where elected officials sought nuclear energy as a way to
reduce deadly
coal pollution.
Unfortunately for the fossil fuel industry, natural gas only
reduces pollution by 55 % (compared to
coal) at the power plant, and only by 17 % (compared to gasoline) out of car tailpipes.
The landmark Clean Power Plan requires
coal - fired power plants to
reduce carbon
pollution in order to do our part to solve the climate crisis.
Beijing is to ban the sale and use of
coal in several regions including its six main districts by 2020 cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and
reduce air
pollution, according to an announcement by local authorities on Monday.
In a Harrisburg Pennsylvania newspaper article the claim was made that (32) «Unfortunately, the largest contributor to the problem, the electric utility industry, continues to get a free ride on its mercury
pollution... other sources are
reducing emissions, not such requirements exist for
coal - fired power plants.»
Coal production ceased finally in the UK in 2015, while the Chinese economy is reducing its heavy reliance on coal production in an attempt to improve on terrible air pollution, especially in major cit
Coal production ceased finally in the UK in 2015, while the Chinese economy is
reducing its heavy reliance on
coal production in an attempt to improve on terrible air pollution, especially in major cit
coal production in an attempt to improve on terrible air
pollution, especially in major cities.
China is certainly anxious to clean up its power generation because of the
pollution, but it is now clear that the 3 per cent
coal tariff was aimed not so much at
reducing emissions but to try and make Australia agree to free trade agreement concessions — which it should not do.
The question is whether it cares to
reduce its own
pollution enough to upgrade its
coal plants and switch to cleaner fuels.
China's environmental policies are designed to
reduce air
pollution and carbon emissions by promoting natural gas in the country's energy mix — replacing some
coal and oil use with natural gas.
Japan, led by Hitachi Power, has developed ultra-supercritical pressure
coal - fired power generation technologies, which convert more of the energy in
coal into power, slash
pollution and
reduce carbon emissions.
Instead of
reducing pollution, we now have a spate of new
coal plants and inevitable greenhouse gas limits on a collision course that puts companies and shareholders at financial risk.»
The concept of «clean
coal» focuses on
reducing air
pollution.