Via email, McCabe tells me that the most important factor in the IEA model is crowding out: Cheap shale gas will
reduce coal usage (good) but will also reduce development of new nuclear, wind, and solar power (bad).
Not exact matches
Winter Weatherproofing For an average home in a cold climate,
reducing home energy
usage by just 15 percent saves the equivalent of 500 pounds of
coal a year.
And though technology is improving our ability to
reduce emissions from
coal usage, natural gas is still a much cleaner source»
Combining carbon capture technology in
coal plants with the specific
usage of CO2 in the oil sector means that capturing CO2 turns into a profitable business in itself while providing an effective incentive for
reducing emissions.
The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change had come down hard on
coal - fired thermal power producers in 2015, setting a December 2017 deadline for meeting revised norms on emissions of particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury and
reduced water
usage.
Jim D: I wonder if they mention that China's life expectancy was
reduced by 5 years in some areas due to increased
coal usage.
I wonder if they mention that China's life expectancy was
reduced by 5 years in some areas due to increased
coal usage.
The fact is that there are many other ways of
reducing emissions — we can
reduce our energy
usage, we can
reduce the carbon intensity of energy by replacing
coal - fired power with gas, we can
reduce emissions from agriculture by eating and farming less cows and sheep and more kangaroos and vegetables, we can sequester carbon in biomass by ending native forest logging and re-vegetating cleared land.
Too bad, as the New York Times point out, that even though natural gas does have a far less impact on global warming than does
coal, if we're going to
reduce carbon emissions by 2050 enough to prevent the worst of climate change, the increase in natural gas
usage won't cut it.