CBO and JCT estimate that enacting the legislation would
reduce federal deficits by $ 337 billion over the 2017 - 2026 period.
«She is encouraged that the Congressional Budget Office says the American Health Care Act will lower premiums by 10 percent,
reduce the federal deficit by $ 337 billion, and lower taxes by $ 883 billion, providing significant tax relief for middle - income families and small business owners.
The CBO also says the bill would
reduce the federal deficit by $ 119 billion.
The CBO analysis of Waxman - Markey found that the bill would
reduce the federal deficit by $ 9 billion by the year 2019.
The CBO analysis of a similar bill proposed by Senators Kerry and Boxer found the bill would
reduce the federal deficit by $ 21 billion by 2019 and «would not increase the deficit in any of the four 10 - year periods following 2019.»
Not exact matches
And all of them argue that the proposed tax cuts, estimated to
reduce federal revenue
by more than $ 1.4 trillion, won't increase
federal deficits, an assertion that's been contradicted
by Congress's official tax scorekeeper.
He would
reduce the
federal debt and
deficit by cutting
federal spending, nearly in half.
CBO and JCT estimate that enacting this legislation would
reduce the cumulative
federal deficit over the 2017 - 2026 period
by $ 321 billion.
In the 2006 Budget, the government promised to
reduce the
deficit by $ 3 billion per year; to
reduce the
federal debt - to - GDP ratio to 25 per cent
by 2012 - 13; to eliminate the total government sector debt (which includes the
federal, provincial and local governments as well as the Canada and Quebec pension plans)
by 2021; and finally, to keep the growth in program expenses below the rate of growth in nominal GDP.
Instead of using it to
reduce the
federal public debt, the government used it to cut the GST
by two percentage points, thereby creating a structural
deficit in advance of the financial meltdown in 2008.
Reducing the GST by two percentage points created a structural deficit that the government has closed by gradually reducing federal spending expressed as a share
Reducing the GST
by two percentage points created a structural
deficit that the government has closed
by gradually
reducing federal spending expressed as a share
reducing federal spending expressed as a share of GDP.
The Congressional Budget Office says the American Health Care Act would
reduce the
federal deficit over the 2017 - 2026 period
by $ 119 billion, but also leave 23 million Americans without insurance, while at the same time lower the average insurance premiums.
[The Congressional Budget Office projected the immigration bill passed
by the Senate in 2013 would boost the economy and
reduce the
federal deficit, while slightly
reducing wages.
Republicans and Democrats have entirely different approaches to the issue, with Republicans willing to slash taxes even at the risk of increasing the
federal deficit, and Democrats such as Higgins insisting that tax reform not
reduce the amount of money collected
by the
federal government
Malloy has tried to
reduce that
deficit by suspending about $ 140 million in state and
federal payments to hospitals.
But he says it was the culmination of a soul - sapping and ultimately unsuccessful battle with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on how to accommodate the rising cost of the James Webb Space Telescope within an overall agency budget being squeezed
by efforts to
reduce federal spending and shrink the
deficit.
Compounding the Administration's self - restraint was the expected squeeze on science
by the Republican - led House of Representatives as part of a relentless campaign to trim overall
federal spending and
reduce the
deficit.
The reduction, required
by the failure of policymakers to abide
by the terms of a 2011 law designed to
reduce the
federal deficit over the next decade,
reduced the lab's budget this year
by $ 100 million, to $ 1.5 billion.
So if a funding
deficit arises in a TBP (because of underfunding, or lower - than - expected investment returns, say), part or all of it can be compensated for
by reducing accrued benefits to employees whereas a traditional DB plan would require the entire
deficit to be funded
by increased contributions on the part of the employer — the
federal government (and
by extension, the taxpayer).
Rep. Lois Capps (D - CA) said, «If we really want to
reduce the need for abortions and
reduce the
federal deficit, we should double the funding for family planning and preventive care, not eliminate it as is being called for
by anti-choice members of Congress.