All in, these new powertrain components should
reduce global carbon dioxide emissions from Toyota vehicles by more than 18 percent.
A massive expansion of land use for sugar cane growth in Brazil, and a subsequent increase in ethanol production with the feedstock could
reduce global carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector by up to 86 percent of 2014 levels, according to research published in the October issue of the journal Nature Climate Change.
Despite the report's regional focus, the authors clarify that the most urgent need is to
reduce global carbon dioxide emissions.
«Recent advances in understanding coral resilience are essential to safeguard coral reefs: A review of the literature points to the importance of
reducing global carbon dioxide emissions in addition to protecting or augmenting resilience mechanisms in the face of increased frequency of climate change impacts..»
Americans will have to pay much higher electricity prices despite the minuscule benefits of the Clean Power Plan, which
reduces global carbon dioxide emissions by less than 1 percent and global temperatures by 0.02 degrees Celsius by 2100, according to EPA's own models.
The lawsuit also bizarrely criticizes the companies for correctly stating that natural gas
reduces global carbon dioxide emissions:
Reducing global carbon dioxide emissions will be an even more daunting challenge than we have been led to believe, according to a sobering commentary in the April 3 issue of Nature magazine.
Not exact matches
Global emissions of
carbon dioxide from the use of fossil fuels are estimated to have to be
reduced by 75 to 80 per cent.
As we recently reported in Nature Climate Change, significantly expanding sugarcane or lipidcane production in Brazil could
reduce current
global carbon dioxide emissions by up to 5.6 percent.
The International Energy Agency estimated last year that both the decline in China's coal use and falling electricity demand
reduced its
carbon dioxide emissions by 1.5 percent in 2014, leading to a 0.2 percent reduction in
global emissions.
Coal - burning power plants in the United States emit about 2.1 billion tons of
carbon dioxide each year — nearly 17 percent of worldwide coal
emissions — and finding technologies that
reduce those
emissions in the United States and China, which burns even more coal than we do, is crucial to combating
global warming.
CSIRO scientist Barrie Pittock presented a paper showing that stabilising the
global level of
carbon dioxide at three times the pre-industrial level will require
reducing emissions below half the present level.
Critics argue that albedo modification and other «geoengineering» schemes are risky and would discourage nations from trying to
reduce their
emissions of
carbon dioxide, the heat - trapping gas that comes from the burning of fossil fuels and that is causing
global warming by absorbing increasing amounts of energy from sunlight.
The grim bottom line (for those emerging from recently melted ice caves): Bring
carbon dioxide emissions under control within the next few years or face serious consequences, including rising sea levels,
reduced agricultural productivity and a
global economic downturn.
Global average temperatures will rise at least 4 °C by 2100 and potentially more than 8 °C by 2200 if
carbon dioxide emissions are not
reduced according to new research published in Nature.
Global average temperatures will rise at least 4 degrees C by 2100 and potentially more than 8 degrees C by 2200 if
carbon dioxide emissions are not
reduced, according to new research.
The costs of
reducing carbon dioxide emissions in order to slow
global warming will have to fall mainly on the rich countries, the bank says.
According to Flannery, even if we
reduce our
carbon dioxide emissions by 70 percent by 2050, average
global temperatures will increase between two and nine degrees by 2100.
If humanity does not act to
reduce global greenhouse gas
emissions, atmospheric
carbon dioxide levels will continue to climb and Earth's average temperature will escalate.
He cited Australia's Parliament, under a conservative coalition elected last year, which last week repealed a two - year - old tax on
carbon dioxide emissions — the country's only legislated policy for
reducing global warming pollution.
New research published in Nature Communications suggests it was the
global financial crisis, not fracking, that has done most to
reduce carbon dioxide (CO2)
emissions from the US.
Because everyone in this
global community will be affected by climate change, it will be for our own benefit if we manage to
reduce carbon dioxide emissions in such a way that
global warming is limited to less than 2 degrees Celsius», says Prof. Ulf Riebesell, marine biologist at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and coordinator of BIOACID.
Once
global carbon dioxide emissions had been
reduced to zero, some combination of atmospheric decay and
carbon dioxide extraction, probably partially offset by some level of
carbon dioxide re-release from the worlds oceans, might possibly
reduce the atmospheric
carbon dioxide concentration to comply with the NAAQS.
Rather, conserving Amazonian forests both
reduces the
carbon dioxide flux from deforestation, which contributes up to a fifth of
global emissions, and also increases the resilience of the forest to climate change.
Mr. Gore, the 2000 Democratic presidential nominee and co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the new spending Mr. Obama is proposing will begin to quickly
reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide and other pollutants blamed for
global warming.
The elements that I believe are key to a successful agreement in Copenhagen include: • Strong targets and timetables from industrialized countries and differentiated but binding commitments from developing countries that put the entire world under a system with one commitment: to
reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide and other
global warming pollutants that cause the climate crisis; • The inclusion of deforestation, which alone accounts for twenty percent of the
emissions that cause
global warming; • The addition of sinks including those from soils, principally from farmlands and grazing lands with appropriate methodologies and accounting.
NEW DELHI — India served notice on Sunday that it remains opposed to legally binding targets to
reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide, digging in its heels against the United States as the Obama administration begins marshaling support for a new
global agreement on climate change.
According to EPA, the entire reason it is regulating
carbon dioxide emissions from cars and trucks is to
reduce global warming and climate change, but EPA's rule does not affect the pace of climate change in any meaningful way.
It calls for
reducing carbon dioxide emissions in hopes of limiting
global warming to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above temperatures at the outset of the Industrial Revolution.
The pledge, if successfully implemented, would
reduce global emissions by between 4.5 billion and 8.8 billion tonnes of
carbon dioxide each year, and it came with a promise of $ 1 billion in funding.
From The Guardian: «The connection to the chemical firm Solvay suggests opposition to action on
global warming, once spearheaded by big oil, is spreading to other industries that will also be affected by proposals to
reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases.»
If we as a society are able to significantly
reduce our
emissions of greenhouse gases (especially
carbon dioxide) to the levels identified in Oregon's statewide goals and the
global Paris climate agreement, we can
reduce the amount and speed of future climate change and its associated impacts.
These are the folks who came up with the Kyoto Protocols that were intended to
reduce «greenhouse gas»
emissions, primarily
carbon dioxide (CO2), in order to save the Earth from becoming a crispy desert as the result of
global warming.
There is no proof that wind farms
reduce carbon dioxide emissions and it is ludicrous to believe that a few windmills in Australia are going to improve
global climate.
Will
reducing carbon dioxide emissions slow down
global warming?
The only way to contain climate change and limit
global warming, they say, is to
reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Proposed supporters of climate alarmism methods to combat
global warming by
reducing carbon dioxide emissions are not only scientifically unfounded - in the absence of extraordinary characteristics of modern climate change, but also incredibly expensive in economic terms.
Defines «reporting entity» to mean: (1) a covered entity; (2) an entity that would be covered if it had emitted, produced, imported, manufactured, or delivered in 2008 or any subsequent year more than the applicable threshold level of
carbon dioxide; (3) other entities that EPA determines will help achieve overall goals of
reducing global warming pollution; (4) any vehicle fleet with
emissions of more than 25,000 tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent on an annual basis, if its inclusion will help achieve such reduction; (5) any entity that delivers electricity to a facility in an energy - intensive industrial sector that meets the energy or GHG intensity criteria.
«At present, CSIRO and other measurements show that atmospheric
carbon dioxide concentrations are rising progressively faster each year — so the judgement of the atmosphere is that
global efforts to
reduce emissions have so far been spectacularly unsuccessful.
With the amount of
carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere, future
emissions will need to be
reduced by half to that of historical
emissions to limit
global average temperature rise to 2 °C.
In order to prevent the rise of average
global temperatures beyond the limit, countries have vowed to
reduce their
emissions of greenhouse gases, including
carbon dioxide.
... the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which includes more than 3,000 scientists from around the world, agrees that climate change is caused by a number of factors, including excess
carbon dioxide... The Government of Alberta accepts the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and recognizes the need to
reduce emissions and take immediate action to deal with the impacts of
global warming.
We are also told that the science on man - made
global warming is «settled», and instead of debating the science, we should be focusing on how to urgently
reduce our
carbon dioxide emissions:
The Clean Power Plan aims to
reduce carbon dioxide emissions from existing fossil fuel - fired power plants by 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 — still a far cry from what is needed to meet our commitments under the Paris Climate Accord to keep
global warming at or below 2 degrees Celsius.
For instance, after storm surges from Hurricane Sandy caused extensive damage to New York City, NY (USA) in October 2012, it convinced the Mayor of New York City, Mike Bloomberg that man - made
global warming is real and that we should immediately
reduce our
carbon dioxide emissions:
As we continue working to
reduce carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gas
emissions, we must ensure federal actions do not «significantly exacerbate»
global warming.
Yet even if appropriate measures were taken today to
reduce global emissions by 80 percent by 2050, current atmospheric concentrations of
carbon dioxide and other long - lived greenhouse gases are already such that the next 50 years of climate change can not be averted.
That legacy doesn't include any legislation to
reduce carbon dioxide emissions and supposedly reverse
global warming.
Americans increasingly understand that even sending US
carbon dioxide emissions back to 1870 levels, as congressional climate bills would do, will not
reduce global atmospheric CO2 levels, because
emissions from China, India and other nations will rapidly offset our painful reductions.
The different policies being introduced specifically to
reduce our
carbon dioxide emissions vary from international treaties, e.g., the Kyoto Protocol (2005), to national laws, e.g., the UK's Climate Change Act, 2008, and even regional legislation e.g., California (USA)'s
Global Warming Solutions Act, 2006.