The ruling elite is desperate to maintain their control and
reduce global population.
Plan B to deal with climate change has always been to
reduce the global population to a less consuming number: http://www.theonion.com/article/scientists-look-one-third-of-the-human-race-has-to-27166 The Onion «America's Finest News Source» nailed it a few years ago.
One of the most effective ways to cut the gas would be to
reduce the global population of ruminant livestock, the university said.
・
Reducing global population growth, especially in LDCs, through antifertility measures has long been declared a central goal of USAID / UN / WHO «family planning» [66]- [77].
Then, with a wealthy and
reducing global population that can afford to take care of the environment, with advances in technology we can only dream of, the world can become a better place with long term sustainability and an end to avoidable human suffering.
Not exact matches
Half a century after Independence, as of now, we have the largest
population of poor people in the world, one third of our rural
population is below the poverty line and despite the UN agencies» massive aid projects, the development assistance of the World Bank, bilateral aid, the Center and State governments» intervention, the gap between the rich and the poor has doubled in the last three decades - fifteen years ago the lowest 20 per cent of
global population received 2.5 per cent of
global wealth whereas at present, the share has been
reduced to less than 1.3 per cent.
But the sense of naivete and unreality, and also of danger, are enhanced when we End Naess stating that by benign means
global population should be
reduced to one hundred million people!
The transition to an ecologically sustainable society requires
reduced consumption of goods, the efficient recycling of materials, a move away from the use of fossil fuels to the use of renewable sources of energy, zero
global population growth, a
reduced standard of living for the rich, an increased standard of living for the poor and an appeal to quality of life instead of materialism.
The
Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 predicted that sugar sweetened drink consumption contributes a relatively small amount to UK
population morbidity (28000 disability adjusted life years) compared with low fruit and vegetable consumption (1130000 disability adjusted life years).59 Using revenue from a sugar sweetened drink tax to
reduce the prices of fruit and vegetables is a potential mechanism for further improving
population health.60
A Worldwide Shift: Profiling the Alternative Meat Market In the past few years, there has been a
global shift away from meat, with 70 % of the world
population reportedly either
reducing meat consumption or leaving meat off the table altogether.
With the
global population rising continuously, urbanization rapidly
reducing land for farming, and climate change threatening stable crop production, a significant improvement in genetic yield potential is one of the most crucial goals in rice research.
«As the
global population is projected to increase by almost 3 billion by 2050, rice breeders urgently need to develop new and sustainable rice varieties with higher yield, healthier grains and
reduced environmental footprints.
The reductions mapped out by the report would not
reduce the size of the
global meat industry, the researchers said, because rising
population is pushing up demand, but it would significantly slow its growth.
Without them our regular supply of food would
reduce by about a third, at a time when we need to increase our food production to cope with a ballooning
global population.
«It is also a general attack on scientific advances aiming to meet one of the world's biggest challenges - providing safe and nutritious food for a growing
global population, whilst
reducing the environmental impact of production.»
They want to feed the growing world
population, boost our reliance on renewable energy or
reduce the burden of
global disease.
«Our findings will inform the development of
global population - level interventions to
reduce stroke, and how such programs may be tailored to individual regions,» said Yusuf, a professor of medicine of McMaster's Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine and director of the PHRI.
This is not to say that GDP is not important, but to say it is the thing that will
reduce overall fertility and stabilize the
global population is a bit tenuous,» he says.
Viruses can significantly affect the protist
population,
reducing their ability to regulate
global cycles.
It is not enough to produce more food; we must also simultaneously stabilize the
global population and
reduce the ecological consequences of food production — a triple challenge.
For example, a large body of research has found switching to an entirely vegetarian diet would make a huge difference on the carbon footprint of our food system — the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security research program reports that if the
global population were to
reduce or cut its meat intake, it would halve the cost of mitigation actions needed to stabilize carbon dioxide levels to 450 parts per million by midcentury — but for many people that is not in the cards.
In the future, it is expected to
reduce reliance on fossil fuels such as oil, coal or gas and help tackle major challenges such as climate change and
global population growth.
The new UNCCD 2018 - 2030 Strategic Framework is the most comprehensive
global commitment to achieve Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) in order to restore the productivity of vast swathes of degraded land, improve the livelihoods of more than 1.3 billion people, and to
reduce the impacts of drought on vulnerable
populations.
«By generating in situ data with the help of citizen scientists, we envision the app serving supplementary data to scientists as they model mosquito
population outbreaks,» says Rusty Low of the Institute for
Global Environmental Strategies, «And equally important is the ability of the app to act as an enabling tool for citizen scientists who want to
reduce disease risk in their communities.»
«As the
global population is projected to increase by almost 3 billion by 2050, rice breeders urgently need to develop new and sustainable rice varieties with higher yield, healthier grains and
reduced environmental footprints.
The new UNCCD 2018 - 2030 Strategic Framework is the most comprehensive
global commitment to achieve Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) in order to restore the productivity of vast expanses of degraded land, improve the livelihoods of more than 1.3 billion people, and
reduce the impacts of drought on vulnerable
populations.
That episode rekindled debate over what should be done to
reduce threats to the estimated 2,000 blue whales of an overall
global population of 10,000 that feed off California each summer.
If Lovelock's hypothesis is correct, Gaia will — through heat waves, famine and
global epidemics — automatically limit or
reduce population to a level the biosphere is capable of sustaining.
In a forthcoming post, I will provide my own thoughts on the necessity for
reducing the unsustainable increase in absolute
global human
population numbers as well as on the need for recognizing «OCPF» as the most powerful means of re-establishing the family of humanity as a sustainable species within the biophysical framework of our wondrous, finite planetary home.
So, we expect based on our finding that continued development will
reduce fertility rates in all but the most advanced countries, and that development will thus slow the rates of
global population growth.
The attempt to increase
global living standards (and thereby
reduce population growth) by exporting production facilities to regions with lower wage and environmental standards has backfired by increasing levels of water, air and soil pollution — increases that have been felt well beyond the boundaries of those regions.
One could argue — on some people do — that, from the perspective of
global resource consumption, a world with fewer individuals living in highly developed countries — ie, the places where per capital resource consumption is highest — would be desirable in order
reduce the climate impact and resource consumption of the human
population.
Now we are a smart species and our agriculture science and production has substantially
reduced famine on our planet and has given us more time than most species have before these
population reductions occur (although
global climate shift and higher energy costs are wildcards in food production and availability in the future).
«Their unceasing drum - beat for Anthropogenic
Global Warming will ultimately discredit their otherwise worthwhile and necessary programs to
reduce human pollution as a result of unrestricted human
population and economic growth.»
I am very skeptical that on a
global population level, humans will bother to do anything other than lip service when it comes to addressing climate change and the changes to our lifestyle required to significantly
reduce our emissions, until it is far too late.
We don't need renewable energy so much as
global concerted effort to
reduce population.
Without additional efforts to
reduce [greenhouse gas] emissions beyond those in place today, emissions growth is expected to persist driven by growth in
global population and economic activities.
I would guess that the answer to your question «are ancillary benefits of
global warming important enough to include in the cost / benefit calculations» is «yes» - e.g.
reduced travel times through ice - free Arctic is probably non-trivial to world trade, changing patterns of agricultural production are net wins for some
populations.
•
global emissions from fossil fuels are
reduce by 50 % in 50 years • Due in part to lower cost energy, the world will be much richer than current projections suggest; as a result,
population growth rate slows to the low end of projections.
Based on the most up - to - date, peer - reviewed literature on emissions modelling, economics, policies and technologies, today's report reveals how governments, industry and the general public could together
reduce the energy and carbon intensity of the
global economy despite growing incomes and
population levels.
Very simple: that the developing world (comprising 82 percent of the
global population, all its 3 billion poorest people and responsible for over 65 percent of
global GHG emissions) was to be exempt from any obligation — legal or moral, now or in future — to
reduce those emissions.
Ecological science indicates clearly that a continuous stable solution to human life can not be maintained unless the
global population of transport vehicles, livestock and humans are
reduced.
Another focus area is climate - smart agriculture that improves yields to feed a growing
global population,
reduces emissions, and adds carbon storage.
51 Fig. 20 - 14, p. 481 Cut fossil fuel use (especially coal) Shift from coal to natural gas Improve energy efficiency Shift to renewable energy resources Transfer energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to developing countries
Reduce deforestation Use more sustainable agriculture and forestry Limit urban sprawl Reduce poverty Slow population growth Remove CO 2 from smoke stack and vehicle emissions Store (sequester) CO2 by planting trees Sequester CO 2 deep underground Sequester CO 2 in soil by using no - till cultivation and taking cropland out of production Sequester CO 2 in the deep ocean Repair leaky natural gas pipelines and facilities Use animal feeds that reduce CH 4 emissions by belching cows Solutions Global Warming PreventionC
Reduce deforestation Use more sustainable agriculture and forestry Limit urban sprawl
Reduce poverty Slow population growth Remove CO 2 from smoke stack and vehicle emissions Store (sequester) CO2 by planting trees Sequester CO 2 deep underground Sequester CO 2 in soil by using no - till cultivation and taking cropland out of production Sequester CO 2 in the deep ocean Repair leaky natural gas pipelines and facilities Use animal feeds that reduce CH 4 emissions by belching cows Solutions Global Warming PreventionC
Reduce poverty Slow
population growth Remove CO 2 from smoke stack and vehicle emissions Store (sequester) CO2 by planting trees Sequester CO 2 deep underground Sequester CO 2 in soil by using no - till cultivation and taking cropland out of production Sequester CO 2 in the deep ocean Repair leaky natural gas pipelines and facilities Use animal feeds that
reduce CH 4 emissions by belching cows Solutions Global Warming PreventionC
reduce CH 4 emissions by belching cows Solutions
Global Warming PreventionCleanup
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5)
global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The
global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply
reduce CO2 emissions (
reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world
population that is increasingly industrializing.
Some of the measures regularly proposed include raising electricity costs,
reducing the
population, instituting
global taxes, redistributing wealth, banning light bulbs, ensuring that developing nations never properly develop, and giving
global bureaucrats more control.
This work relies on the new flood risk assessment framework proposed by Alfieri et al. (2015b) to illustrate the benefits of adaptation in
reducing expected damages and
population affected by river floods in Europe under 4 °C
global warming by the end of the century.
Nor do I believe that the
global population should be
reduced.
Washington, D.C. — A survey of North American cities by the ACEEE and the
Global Cool Cities Alliance (GCCA) finds that confronting the challenges of extreme weather, adapting to a changing climate, and improving the health and resiliency of urban
populations are driving cities to develop and implement strategies to
reduce excess urban heat.
Unfortunately for the ruling elite they know they have lost, run out of time and are unable to stop major planetary changes even with massive
global geoengineering that is designed to dumb down and
reduce the
population.