The Ohio Senate yesterday approved a plan (SJR 1) to create a Public Office Compensation Commission with the power to
reduce judicial salaries mid-term in cases of fiscal emergency, a departure from a 2014 proposal which would have allowed them to be diminished for any reason.
Not exact matches
By that logic, fewer judges would be needed to deal with more cases,
reducing the cost of
judicial salaries and pensions and the court estate.
Interestingly, and unlike a similar
salary commission on the ballot in Arkansas in 2014, the Kentucky version retains the constitutional provision that protects a diminishment of
judicial compensation («The compensation of a justice or judge shall not be
reduced during his term.»)
Nearly every state has a constitutional provision related to
judicial salaries and compensation, however they vary widely in terms of whether or not such items can be
reduced or increased (as was the case in Arkansas for decades) and if so under what conditions.
This was in stark contrast with Arkansas» constitutional amendment creating a Commission - system approved by voters the month prior that reiterated that
judicial salaries could not be
reduced during terms of office.
(e) that the Government may not
reduce the
salaries, pensions or benefits of Judges, individually or collectively, without infringing the principle of
judicial independence,