Under the 2015 deal forged by a multinational coalition, Iran agreed to
reduce nuclear facilities in exchange for unlocking frozen assets and sanctions relief.
Not exact matches
The NY Post: «Any energy plan that clearly recognizes the role
nuclear energy has in
reducing dangerous emissions should be welcomed by all New Yorkers — and would be if it wasn't clear that the state is picking and choosing which
nuclear - power
facilities should stay open at the expense of taxpayers, especially those in New York City.»
But shrinking the company's
nuclear fleet means that overhead costs are spread across fewer
facilities,
reducing profits.
I said I don't think it's a «wicked» problem, in that if we decide to
reduce our emissions we have all the tools available to us —
nuclear power plants, hydroelectric
facilities, renewables, etc..