Legal efforts to correct the effects of past official discrimination were followed by sporadic attempts, initiated by local governments and school districts, to
reduce school segregation by voluntarily adopting race - conscious school - assignment plans.
The report presents arguments and solutions largely driven by ideology, not evidence, offering little value for policymakers or educators meaningfully engaged in the critical search for strategies to
reduce school segregation.
States Step Up Efforts to
Reduce School Segregation In response to a state Supreme Court ruling that children in Hartfords urban schools were receiving an inferior and unequal education, Connecticut stepped up efforts to improve the education of urban schools.
To the extent that school choice increases rather than
reduces school segregation, there is work to be done.
Not exact matches
However, evidence from a range of sources released in recent months has been overwhelming in its condemnation of the move, revealing that removing the so - called 50 % cap on religious selection would not only lead to increased levels of
segregation in
schools and communities, but also damage social mobility and
reduce the access of parents to their local
schools.
Changing
school attendance policies could be «more feasible than
reducing income inequality, raising the minimum wage, instituting metropolitan governance, or creating affordable housing stock to address residential
segregation,» Owens wrote.
«If
schools play an important role in residential
segregation, then breaking that link and making it less important and sort of alleviating parents» concerns about where their kids are going to attend
school would
reduce income
segregation,» Owens said.
«Neighborhood and
school poverty are big drivers of low - income kids» poor educational outcomes, so rising income
segregation perpetuates inequality and may
reduce poor kids» mobility.»
Transporting students long distances to
reduce segregation in
schools is costly, time - consuming for students, and likely to
reduce parental participation in the
schools.
In 1975, Coleman published a follow - up study that concluded that the main impediment to
school desegregation was the growing residential
segregation «between central city and suburbs,» and that the «current means by which
schools are being desegregated are intensifying that problem, rather than
reducing it.»
The use of interdistrict - choice programs is unlikely to increase most students» educational opportunities significantly, a new report concludes, despite recent attention to the idea as a means of
reducing economic and racial
segregation and giving students in low - performing public
schools a chance to find a better
school.
The evidence is that choice among government
schools reduced income
segregation.
On the positive side, he says, were «some political figures» who began to realize that we «need to stop demonizing teachers and their democratically elected representatives, and focus instead on what really matters:
reducing poverty and
school segregation.»
When I was superintendent of
schools in Stamford, Conn., a very diverse system (40 % Hispanic, 22 % black, 8 % Asian, 30 % white, 40 % free and
reduced - price lunch, 15 % English learners), I was faced with institutional
segregation of students within desegregated
schools.
Hartford, Connecticut, has significantly
reduced economic
segregation in its
schools through a strategic system of student transfers called Open Choice.124
Waldrip, whose full article is linked here with many more specifics acknowledges that while magnet
schools are still used to improve diversity and
reduce segregation, they have rapidly become superior options within the public sector for all students, even in districts of primarily one race.
Existing research on other conventional
school voucher programs point to a number of problems, including: lower student performance, less accountability,
reduced access and increased
segregation.
May 19, 2016 by Brett Kittredge As the United States marks the 62nd anniversary of the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education decision which declared state laws establishing separate public
schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional, a new study looks at the effect
school choice has had in
reducing racial
segregation in
schools.
The children's charity claimed its proposal, known as «fair banding», could
reduce social
segregation in the
school system.
The effort has saved tens of millions of dollars and
reduced segregation of students with disabilities, but it has triggered concerns that some students are being made to attend city
schools that aren't equipped to handle their needs.
In addition, Walker's budget eliminates Chapter 220 — the only educational program in Milwaukee designed to
reduce racial
segregation in public
schools and improve equal opportunity for students of color.
Emmanuel: With all of this, the original idea was that these measures would only be needed temporarily, but that was assuming policies would work in concert — that policies aimed at
reducing housing
segregation would have worked, and we wouldn't see that black and Hispanic students are still much more likely to attend high poverty
schools than their white peers.
Peer tutoring could
reduce racial
segregation both within and between
schools while narrowing the achievement gap.
The
reduced teacher voice and increased
segregation might seem defensible if charter
schools were clearly providing a superior form of education to students systemwide.
With the establishment of the Sheff standard for racial integration in 2008, magnet
schools have become the state's primary method for
reducing racial
segregation and promoting integration within the Greater Hartford Region public
school system.
So, at the same time it continues to promote the growth of charter
schools, the Obama administration should take immediate action to
reduce the
segregation in charter
schools, working instead to achieve the integrative promise of charter
schools.
He recommends three strategies: devoting more resources to the early grades; providing extended time in
school (provided that it's used effectively); and doing more to
reduce socioeconomic
segregation in
school assignment and thus provide more equal access to high - quality teachers, stimulating curriculum and instruction, and adequate
school resources.
The REAL TRUTH is that while Connecticut spends massive amount of money to fulfill its federal and state constitutional mandate of
REDUCING segregation, Connecticut charter
schools are using public money to actually INCREASE racial
segregation in Connecticut!
While the State of Connecticut spends hundreds of millions of dollars every year to
reduce racial isolation in our urban
school districts, as required by Connecticut's Constitution and Courts, Governor Dannel Malloy is pumping more than $ 100 million a year into Connecticut Charter
Schools despite the fact that they have become a primary vehicle for the
segregation of our public
school system.
Yet, as the report goes on to note, these state officials, those with the express obligation to
reduce segregation, have consistently chosen to do nothing to prevent charter
school segregation and its effects, including exacerbating racial, ethnic and economic imbalance in the host
school districts.
She argues that
school reformers assume that
schools can do more to address poverty than is realistic, that accountability policies encourage narrowing of the curriculum and teaching to the test, that vouchers have accumulated no significant evidence of effectiveness, that «virtual charter
schools» are a ripoff of taxpayers, and that there are more effective policy solutions that are far from test - based accountability and «
school choice» policies: social services for poor families, early childhood education, protecting the autonomy of teachers and elected
school boards,
reducing class sizes, eliminating for - profit companies and chains from operating charter
schools, and aggressively fighting racial and socioeconomic
segregation in
schools.