More resources will improve student achievement, and can
reduce test score gaps between disadvantaged students and more advantaged students.
This indicates that while there are many reasons why school districts and states might want to seek to integrate relatively advantaged and relatively disadvantaged students within the same school, it appears unlikely that a policy goal of
reducing the test score gap between students in these groups will be realized through further socioeconomic integration (at least once there gets to be the degree of socioeconomic integration necessary to be part of this study to begin with).
Not exact matches
And depending upon which scale one uses, vouchers appear to
reduce the black - white
test score gap by either one - quarter or one - third.
For example, the effect of a one - hour later start time on math
scores is roughly 14 percent of the black - white
test -
score gap, 40 percent of the
gap between those eligible and those not eligible for free or
reduced - price lunch, and 85 percent of the gain associated with an additional year of parents» education.
Eliminating the
test score gap would also
reduce racial disparities in men's earnings and would probably eliminate the racial disparities in women's earnings.
The authors of the funding study report that the school finance reforms they studied actually did not
reduce socio - economic and racial
gaps in
test scores because low - income and minority students are not very concentrated in the districts that enjoyed spending increases.
Eliminating exclusionary zoning in a metro area would, by
reducing its housing cost
gap, lower its school
test -
score gap by an estimated 4 to 7 percentiles — a significant share of the observed
gap between schools serving the average low - income versus middle / higher - income student.
Thus closing the
test -
score gaps that emerge in high school may be a critical prerequisite to
reducing wage inequality between the races.
Adjusting the
test -
score data for this factor
reduces the
gap even more.
As scholars Christopher Jencks and Meredith Phillips write, «
Reducing the black - white
test score gap would do more to promote racial equality than any other strategy that commands broad political support.»
Thus adjusting the data for the effects of socioeconomic status
reduces the estimated racial
gaps in
test scores by more than 40 percent in math and more than 66 percent in reading.
The current strategy that schools alone can do the job of
reducing social inequalities, including the
test score gap between minorities and whites, is simply flawed.
Consequently,
reducing the well - known
gap between the
test scores of black and white students is now seen as an important way to
reduce economic and other forms of inequality.
How well are schools — and other forces outside of school — doing at
reducing the black - white
test -
score gap as young people move from one grade to the next?
The proposed reforms, outside and inside schools — to
reduce the
test -
score gap between whites and poor minorities; to help poor minority families increase their income through steady work at livable wages and then their children's
test scores will improve; to establish research - proven reading programs for every single, poor, or minority child; to give each kid a laptop computer — are endless and uncertain in their outcomes.
Such was found in Walter M. Haney's study for the Center for the Study of
Testing, Evaluation, and Education Policy at Boston College entitled «Evidence on Education under NCLB (and How Florida Boosted NAEP
Scores and
Reduced the Race
Gap)».
In fact, the
test score gap between low - income minorities and affluent whites was
reduced by 86 percent in math and 66 percent in English.
We use panel data in Washington State to study the extent to which teacher assignments between fourth and eighth grade explain
gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged students — as defined by underrepresented minority status (URM) and eligibility for free or
reduced price lunch (FRL)-- in their eighth grade math
test scores and high school course taking.
-
Reduced achievement
gap - Increased course passing rate - Increased graduation rates - Higher standardized
test scores in reading and math - More AP and IB
tests taken - Fewer suspensions - Lower absenteeism
Further, participation in NC Pre-K
reduced the
gap in average 3rd grade
test scores between low - income children and their peers who did not qualify for free or
reduced - price meals.North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Office of Early Learning.