The ocean's ability to absorb heat and carbon could
reduce the warming already in the pipeline by 0.2 to 0.3 C, they wrote.
Not exact matches
Aerosols are
already known to
reduce global
warming: The vast clouds of sulfates thrown up in the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, for example,
reduced average global temperatures by about half a degree Celsius.
During the 2003 heat wave in Europe, reactors at inland sites in France were shut down or had their power output
reduced because the water receiving the discharge was
already warmer than environmental regulations allowed.
«The overall significance is that although we
already know that
reducing methane emissions can bring great societal benefits via decreased near - term
warming and improved air quality, and that many of the sources can be controlled at low or even negative cost, we still need better data on emissions from particular sources,» Duke University climate sciences professor Drew Shindell said.
As a result, these experts say efforts to combat climate change must focus not only on
reducing greenhouse gas emissions that drive global
warming but also on adjusting to the changes
already underway.
Trying to find other issues, «Masking», or crutches,... still isn't ever goin to
reduce the numbers on the GHG content we
already have and their future global
warming potentials that continue to go calculate, compound daily...
It's unlikely that the fossil fuel companies will deny in court what is widely accepted by authoritative scientific bodies around the world: that human emissions have
already begun to
warm the planet, that the harm is
already being felt, that the risks of future harm are significant, and that to head them off emissions have to be rapidly
reduced.
Many regions of the world are
already tapping geothermal energy as an affordable and sustainable solution to
reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and the global
warming and public health risks that result from their use.
And shouldn't it have helped
reduce the element of surprise that a National Academy of Sciences study
already concluded that the
warming seen in the surface station record was «undoubtedly real,» that Menne et al showed that highly touted station siting issues did not in fact compromise the record, that the satellite record agrees with the surface record in every important respect (see Fig. 7 here), and that numerous independent studies (many of them by amateurs) also confirmed the
warming trend?
I feel that the only thing we can conclude with confidence [from the models] is that the climate will
warm [more than it
already has done] if we don't take action to
reduce emissions.
The fact that radiosondes agree more both with RSS and UAH TLT data in the northern hemisphere after the correction, without
reducing the level of agreement
already existing with UAH in the tropics, means that the correction shows a curious effect that I had mentioned before: there is more
warming in the extratropical northern hemisphere's lower troposphere than in the tropics.
due to co2 we are
already living in a greenhouse.Whatever one does in that greenhouse will remain in the greenhouse.INDUSTRIOUS HEAT will remain in the greenhouse instead of escaping into outer space; this is a far greater contributor to global
warming than other factors and far more difficult to
reduce without
reducing economic activity.Like
warm moist air from your mouth on cold mornings so melting antarctic ice will turn into cloud as it meets
warm moist air from tropics the seas will not rise as antarctica is a huge cloud generator.A thick band of cloud around the earth will produce even temps accross the whole earth causing the wind to moderate even stop.WE should be preparing for this possible scenario»
That may undo some of the
warming already done and likewise
reduce the amount in the pipeline (since it will
reduce before it appears).
Likewise, our decisions on whether and how to adapt to the degree of
warming that is
already inevitable can help us
reduce the impacts of future
warming.
Soot and haze in the air
already reduce surface insolation up to 10 % in some places, an effect said to mitigate the
warming effect of greenhouse gases.
July 27, Comments 13, 186 and 213) global
warming will not just stop then because nothing will be
reducing the 35 %, perhaps now close to 40 %, overload of GHGs
already in air.
King said green energy
already had advantages over fossil fuel power in cutting deadly air pollution and
reducing the carbon emissions that drive global
warming.
Warming is leading to more volatile weather patterns that are
already reducing crop yields, the IPCC has warned
Indeed, cod have
already been negatively affected.3, 10 The shifts in plankton ecosystems linked to
warmer surface temperatures have produced a poor food environment for young cod (larvae),
reducing the chances that they will survive until they are large enough to be harvested.10
The greenhouse theory has
already made two wrong predictions First, that adding carbon dioxide to air will
reduce atmospheric IR transmittance (it didn't); and second, that it will cause twenty - first century
warming (it didn't).
Now imagine if there was
already a known mechanism of IR scattering that
reduced IR loss to space resulting in a heating effect, and that the particulars of the mechanism were well understood, and that the substances responsible for this mechanism were very well known, and that we were increasing the concentration of this substance quite dramatically, and that we we seeing temperature rises as had had been hypothesized almost a century ago, and that some signs indicative of this particular mechanism for
warming had been observed.
His conclusion was that the CO2 forcing is unquestionably logarithmic, so that each additional molecule we emit has less forcing and
warming effect than its predecessors; that the precise value of the coefficient in the CO2 forcing function, which the IPCC has
already reduced by 15 %, can not be determined; and that, all things considered, 1 K per doubling was probably in the right ball - park.
«Smart investors can
already see that most fossil fuel reserves are essentially unburnable because of the need to
reduce emissions in line with the global agreement by governments to avoid global
warming of more than 2 °C.
Bottom line: global
warming is
already here (something we've known for awhile) and it is
reducing the amount of food that be grown.
While global
warming alarmists continue to fantasize crude oil use getting drastically
reduced already starting next year, OPEC sees it totally differently.
Without a herculean effort to not only
reduce greenhouse gasses, but to recapture them from the atmosphere, 2 C
warming is
already locked in (this Century or longer term).
What the EPA does not communicate clearly to the public, however, is that none of these health benefits come from decreasing carbon dioxide emissions to avoid global
warming, but from coincidental benefits (or «co-benefits») from
reducing other air pollutants which the EPA
already heavily regulates.
Global greenhouse gas emissions per region / Global CO2 emissions per region from fossil - fuel use and cement production The Report includes a new systematic assessment of how various economic sectors can
reduce their climate -
warming emissions, focusing on the potential eductions from the wide application of
already - known and cost - effective technologies.
The US apparent unwillingness to
reduce its greenhouse gas emissions beyond what it is
already on track to achieve is of considerable controversy in the Qatar negotiations this week because of the growing scientific concern about the potential inevitability of catastrophic
warming caused by human activities.
Because of its cold - adapted features and rapid
warming, climate change impacts on Alaska are
already pronounced, including earlier spring snowmelt,
reduced sea ice, widespread glacier retreat,
warmer permafrost, drier landscapes, and more extensive insect outbreaks and wildfire, as described below.
Many cities, in this country and abroad,
already have strong local policies and programs in place to
reduce global
warming pollution, but more action is needed at the local, state, and federal levels to meet the challenge.
Strong evidence suggests that crops are easily damaged by high temperatures during their germination season, and that
warming over the last three decades has
already reduced crop yields.
Just like that, we're
already halfway to our new goal of
reducing global
warming pollution from power plants.
For conscientious consumers who
already own a diesel vehicle, filling up with biodiesel may
reduce your overall global
warming emissions, especially if your biodiesel supplier is focused on waste resources.
Even though the Dutch government
already had a reasonably ambitious GHG emissions reduction plan in place, the court held that it was insufficient given international recognition at COP16 in 2010 that developed countries need to
reduce their emissions 25 to 40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 in order to avoid 2 C of
warming.
-- the world has been
warming up a bit — human activity probably has something to do with that — some models say this might influence the frequency of severe weather events — therefore, an expensive year for civilisation (and insurance companies) means that climate change is
already happening — therefore, we need a global agreement to
reduce carbon emissions
I've no doubt that most of you are
already sincerely striving to do your part to
reduce global
warming: color your halos green!
A much more serious concern is that the 1 degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature that's attributable to global
warming could
already be threatening tropical biodiversity and
reducing crop yields in densely populated countries in Africa and southern Asia.
And much of this palm oil is produced in ways that involve the destruction of tropical forests and peatlands, adding to global
warming emissions and
reducing habitat for many
already threatened species.
It is expected to stress, more convincingly than ever before, that our planet is
already warming due to human actions, and that «business as usual» would lead to unacceptable risks, underscoring the urgent need for concerted international action to
reduce the worst impacts of climate change.
The effects of global
warming are
already reducing output and imposing costs in public health and safety.
The reverse effect of a more quiescent sun
reduces direct solar
warming and, by permitting the penetration of cosmic rays, facilitates low cloud formation, which increases reflection of
already reduced solar radiation,
reduces clear sky,
reduces evaporation and simultaneously
reduces the availability of the most important greenhouse gas, water vapor, through condensation and precipitation.
The
warming the world has
already experienced could be enough to melt more than a third of the world's glaciers outside Antarctica and Greenland — regardless of current efforts to
reduce emissions.
Proposals by Copenhagen City Council member Claus Bondam are supposed to up renewable energy use (although plenty of wind turbines can
already be seen spinning in the city harbor),
reduce cars in the city center (pretty bike - amenable now) and green up district heating systems by tapping into a
warm water reservoir 2.5 kilometers beneath the city.
Some of this
warming will occur even if future greenhouse gas emissions are
reduced, because the Earth system has not yet fully adjusted to environmental changes we have
already made.
Lastly, even the most aggressive CO2 mitigation steps as envisioned now can only limit further additions to the committed
warming, but not
reduce the
already committed GHGs
warming of 2.4 °C.
«The prospect that global
warming could
reduce the ocean's oxygen has led some scientists to wonder if the predicted decline has
already begun... Pauly
The cap and trade model for
reducing global
warming pollution is
already being used in the European Union and a cluster of 10 Northeastern states.
«Until recently, it was widely assumed that coral would bleach and die off worldwide as the oceans
warm due to climate change,» explained Jessica Carilli, a coral researcher at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, «this would have very serious consequences, as loss of live coral —
already observed in parts of the world — directly
reduces fish habitats and the shoreline protection reefs provide from storms.»