This leads to different dynamics of the regional fire cycles: In the Northern US, negative correlations of fire with water storage or vegetation for negative lags (fire leads) suggest that the enhanced fire frequency will
reduce vegetation carbon and affect subsequent droughts lasting for several years.
Not exact matches
The study also concludes that, over a 15 - year period, cutting the black
carbon produced by burning fossil fuels,
vegetation, dung and other sources could
reduce the warming the Earth has experienced since the Industrial Revolution — about 0.8 degrees Celsius — by 17 to 23 percent.
Cutting the black
carbon, or soot, produced by burning fossil fuels,
vegetation, dung and other sources could
reduce global warming
Although
carbon stocks may be the same with or without understory
vegetation, by controlling competing
vegetation,
carbon is reallocated into the trees instead of shrubs; and
carbon loss to wildfire is
reduced.
Desertification also contributes to climate change, with land degradation and related loss of
vegetation resulting in increased emissions and
reduced carbon sink.
Altogether, therefore, common sense suggests that with the plant productivity gains that result from the aerial fertilization effect of the ongoing rise in atmospheric CO2, plus its transpiration -
reducing effect that boosts plant water use efficiency, along with its stress - alleviating effect that lessens the negative growth impacts of resource limitations and environmental constraints, the world's
vegetation possesses an ideal set of abilities to reap a tremendous benefit from what the President inaccurately terms «
carbon pollution» in the years and decades to come.
Double CO2 climate scenarios increase wildfire events by 40 - 50 % in California (Fried et al., 2004), and double fire risk in Cape Fynbos (Midgley et al., 2005), favouring re-sprouting plants in Fynbos (Bond and Midgley, 2003), fire - tolerant shrub dominance in the Mediterranean Basin (Mouillot et al., 2002), and
vegetation structural change in California (needle - leaved to broad - leaved trees, trees to grasses) and
reducing productivity and
carbon sequestration (Lenihan et al., 2003).
«Replacing the native
vegetation by sown pastures or crops might increase the meat yield and
reduce the
carbon footprint but generates negative impacts on the use of nutrients, pesticide contamination, soil erosion and use of fossil fuels,» said Modernel.
The rate of build - up of CO2 in the atmosphere can be
reduced by taking advantage of the fact that atmospheric CO2 can accumulate as
carbon in
vegetation and soils in terrestrial ecosystems.