Reduced federal oversight means local stakeholders must ensure accountability This has been a hard year for poor children and children of color in a gridlocked and cantankerous Congress.
Not exact matches
The support for the ESSA has largely come from its
reducing much of the heavy - handed
federal oversight of education.
The ESSA is to
reduce «the
federal footprint and restore local control, while empowering parents and education leaders to hold schools accountable for effectively teaching students» within their states, and also «[reset] Washington's relationship with the nation's 100,000 public schools» and its nearly 50 million public school students and their 3.4 million public school teachers, while «sending significant power back to states and local districts while maintaining limited
federal oversight of education.»
It's thought that Alexander's overhaul could end up greatly
reducing the
federal government's role in education and leaving more
oversight to the states.
Reducing transparency at the
federal oversight level is just one roadblock facing our movement, but Best Friends remains resolute in our commitment to bring the entire country to no - kill.
In December 2016, the
Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the Governor General in Council and six federal government ministers, after the Federal Court found they had breached their duty to consult the Mikisew Cree on the development and introduction in Parliament of two omnibus bills that reduced federal regulatory oversight of works and projects that might affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty
Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the Governor General in Council and six
federal government ministers, after the Federal Court found they had breached their duty to consult the Mikisew Cree on the development and introduction in Parliament of two omnibus bills that reduced federal regulatory oversight of works and projects that might affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty
federal government ministers, after the
Federal Court found they had breached their duty to consult the Mikisew Cree on the development and introduction in Parliament of two omnibus bills that reduced federal regulatory oversight of works and projects that might affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty
Federal Court found they had breached their duty to consult the Mikisew Cree on the development and introduction in Parliament of two omnibus bills that
reduced federal regulatory oversight of works and projects that might affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty
federal regulatory
oversight of works and projects that might affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty rights.
[4] At the
Federal Court, the Mikisew Cree argued that the duty to consult was triggered by the development and introduction of new legislation because it constituted executive action that reduced federal regulatory oversight on works or projects that may affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty rights to hunt, fish, an
Federal Court, the Mikisew Cree argued that the duty to consult was triggered by the development and introduction of new legislation because it constituted executive action that
reduced federal regulatory oversight on works or projects that may affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty rights to hunt, fish, an
federal regulatory
oversight on works or projects that may affect the Mikisew Cree's treaty rights to hunt, fish, and trap.