Predicted increases in temperature will drive increased shrinkage of glaciers, leading to initial increases in melt water produced, followed by subsequent declines with
reduced glacier mass.
Not exact matches
However, the idea is simple, and I've talked about this much in many presentations this winter: Take the amount of ice you need to get rid of from Greenland to raise sea level 2 m in the next century,
reduce it by your best estimate of the amount that would be removed by surface
mass balance losses, and try to push the rest out of the aggregate cross-sectional area of Greenland's marine - based outlet
glaciers.
Reducing the pollution will significantly
reduce the rate at which
glacier mass balance is lost in the Himalayas.
If a
glacier has large homogenous areas this
reduces the measurement density (Lemon Creek
Glacier), if it has many small unique
mass balance zones a higher measurement density is required (Columbia
Glacier).
«The
reduced mass from thinning makes this
glacier particularly vulnerable.
According to Farjana Sikandar Birajdar, lead author of the study, the melting of
glaciers would
reduce the ice
mass balance even as it resulted in formation of new lakes with loose moraine.
«Widespread
mass losses from
glaciers and reductions in snow cover over recent decades are projected to accelerate throughout the 21st century,
reducing water availability, hydropower potential, and changing seasonality of flows in regions supplied by meltwater from major mountain ranges (e.g. Hindu - Kush, Himalaya, Andes)...»