Sentences with phrase «reduced lunch status»

Differences in free or reduced lunch status in KIPP CMO charters and its surrounding districts.

But perhaps this problem has never been stated as starkly as in a recent paper examining the distribution of teacher quality in Washington state: «We demonstrate that in elementary, middle school, and high school classrooms (both math and reading), every measure of teacher quality — experience, licensure exam score, and value - added estimates of effectiveness — is inequitably distributed across every indicator of student disadvantage — free / reduced lunch status, underrepresented minority, and low prior academic performance.»

Academic data was collected on approximately 900 participants of the program in 2007 as well as a comparison group comprised of approximately 700 DPS students who did not attend the program and were of similar academic proficiency, grade level, gender, race / ethnicity and free and reduced lunch status.

Not exact matches

Dr. Daniel Taber, the new study's lead author from the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said students who receive free or reduced - price lunches from the government tend to be more obese, but that may be due to their families» low - income status.

«Even when the studies did look at free and reduced lunch or socioeconomic status of the kids... they still in many cases did not find a correlation between AP and college success,» Pope said in an interview.

This area gets even trickier because not every student on «paid» status actually does pay — some school districts allow student with no free or reduced eligibility and no money to pay for their lunch, to «charge» the cost of the meal, and then try later to collect these unpaid charges from the family, often with mixed success.

Forty to 60 percent percent of the students at the schools qualified for free or reduced lunch, a marker for low socioeconomic status.

They measured educational outcomes using standardized tests and looked at demographic data, including attendance and suspension; race and ethnicity; free and reduced price lunch status; and participation in gifted education, special education, or programs for English learners.

While the district was also beginning to see a greater range in terms of students» socioeconomic status, at the time of the initial course implementation, the district's rate of free and reduced lunch was approximately 10 - 12 percent.

Controlling for student demographics, 8th - grade test scores, English language skills, special education program participation, free or reduced - price lunch status (a measure of family income), and mobility during middle school does not alter the basic patterns of graduation and college attendance seen in the descriptive comparisons.

These indicate how well a teacher's students did relative to other teachers» students, controlling for prior student achievement and for student and family background characteristics (for example, age, race and ethnicity, disability, free or reduced - price lunch status, and parental education level).

Because the administrative files provide only a very coarse measure of family socioeconomic status — eligibility for the federal free or reduced - price lunch program — we constructed an additional proxy for family income by matching each student's residential address to U.S. Census data on the median household income in the student's neighborhood.

Specifically, we calculate growth for schools based on math scores while taking into account students» prior performance in both math and communication arts; characteristics that include race, gender, free or reduced - price lunch eligibility (FRL), English - language - learner status, special education status, mobility status, and grade level; and school - wide averages of these student characteristics.

The student data include test scores, race and ethnicity, eligibility for the federal free and reduced - price lunch program, and status as an ESL or special - education student.

In particular, socioeconomic data based on free - and reduced - price lunch status are weak and getting worse.

The Free and Reduced Price lunch definition has become fairly sketchy, so in the below comparisons I will make use of parental education as a proxy for socio - economic status.

The Massachusetts Students Information Management System (SIMS) contains information on all Massachusetts public school students» race, ethnicity, sex, reduced - price lunch status, special education status, English - language learner status, town of residence, and current school.

Database participants also have access to Saint Paul Public Schools aggregate data for youth in their program — including test scores, attendance, and free - and - reduced price lunch status.

- The school attended - School year - Minority status - Eligibility for free or reduced - cost lunch (a proxy for low socioeconomic status)- Date of birth - Assigned teacher - English language proficiency - Testing exemption status - Test scores on the annual TAAS exam in each year in which the student was enrolled in a Texas school

We used percentage of students eligible for free or reduced lunch as a proxy for socioeconomic status (SES).

The national average of students who qualify for free or reduced - price lunch — the best indicator of socioeconomic status — is 50 percent; 26 almost all these schools served school populations in which less than one - third of students were eligible for free or reduced - price lunches.

However, the percent of test - takers who are eligible for free and reduced lunch has fluctuated from year to year, and NAEP results have increased not just across race, but across all subgroups such as gender, disability status, and ELL status.

The growth model adjusts for the specific context of your teachers» students, including prior MAP score, English Language Learner Status, Special Education Status, Free / Reduced Price Lunch Status, and other student characteristics.

AIR required student data; race, sex, zip code, race, free / reduced lunch, ELL status, Special Needs status, name, district, school, etc. when scoring the field test.

The DOE also issued a regulation permitting schools to use to information about children's eligibility for the Free and Reduced Lunch Program as a means of determining students» socioeconomic status for school assignment purposes.

(Note on calculations: I used the appendix information on how test scores varied with free and reduced price lunch status, pre-K participation, and pre-K participation interacted with free and reduced price lunch status, as well as published information on the standard deviation of test scores at kindergarten entrance.

For example, a 2010 New York state charter school law requiring charter schools to mimic the demographics of the surrounding neighborhood — implemented to address gaps in English language learner and special education enrollment at charter schools — might mean, if enforced, that a school in upper Manhattan's District 6 would need to enroll a student population in which 98 percent are eligible for free or reduced - price lunch, a commonly used measure of low - income status.64

Results are provided for groups of students defined by shared characteristics — race or ethnicity, gender, eligibility for free / reduced - price school lunch, highest level of parental education, type of school, charter school, type of school location, region of the country, status as students with disabilities, and status as students identified as English language learners.

They examined a variety of factors, such as student gender, age, health, socioeconomic status, education of parents, whether the school was urban or suburban, the number of years of experience among teachers, the school's average test performance and the rate of free - or reduced - price lunch program participation.

Cross-referencing those schools with the Free and Reduced Lunch data (which is often used as an indicator of low income status), we can see that the schools that qualify have significantly fewer socioeconomically disadvantaged students.

A recent analysis examined 2013 NAEP scores among states after adjusting for various demographic characteristics of each states» student population, such as eligibility for free and reduced price lunch, status as ELLs, and other factors.

If the socio - economic status of its students is factored into the ratings, however, Reo's grade moves up to an A. That's because 87 percent of the school's 189 students are «economically disadvantaged,» which means they qualify for a free or reduced price lunch.

We use panel data in Washington State to study the extent to which teacher assignments between fourth and eighth grade explain gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged students — as defined by underrepresented minority status (URM) and eligibility for free or reduced price lunch (FRL)-- in their eighth grade math test scores and high school course taking.

The fact of the matter is is that all states have essentially the same school level data (i.e., very similar test scores by students over time, links to teachers, and series of typically dichotomous / binary variables meant to capture things like special education status, English language status, free - and - reduced lunch eligibility, etc.).

The District attempts to compensate for some of these factors, weighing special education status, English proficiency, attendance, and eligibility for free or reduced - price lunch — a common proxy for poverty — in developing growth predictions for students.

School lunch eligibility status (free, reduced price, and full price) also served as a proxy for socioeconomic status.