Sentences with phrase «reduced meal eligibility»

70 % of their students are eligible for free and reduced meals and two schools have 100 % free and reduced meal eligibility.

For the interactive chart Comparing Average Scale Score & Free / Reduced Meal Eligibility in CT School Districts 2012 go to: http://commons.trincoll.edu/cssp/2016/12/27/do-connecticuts-privately-managed-charter-schools-outperform-local-public-school-districts/

By placing these data points on a scatterplot, we can more easily compare the average test results of districts and charter schools that are similar in terms of district - wide free and reduced meal eligibility.

Not exact matches

Many of these kids» families earn just enough to miss the cutoff for eligibility for reduced price meals, but that is a far cry from saying that they can easily absorb a 10 or 20 cent increase per day for each of their kids» meals.

Either 70 percent or more students qualify for free or reduced - price (FRP) meals, or the school operates community eligibility or Provision 2;

Either 70 percent or more students qualify for free or reduced prices meals, or the school operates community eligibility (CEP) or Provision 2;

We utilize Provision 2 to reduce the paperwork burden and have tried several methods of collecting data and determining the eligibility of meals.

This area gets even trickier because not every student on «paid» status actually does pay — some school districts allow student with no free or reduced eligibility and no money to pay for their lunch, to «charge» the cost of the meal, and then try later to collect these unpaid charges from the family, often with mixed success.

With Community Eligibility, all students receive meals at no charge, and schools enjoy a reduced paperwork burden.

(check the facts, Winter 2010) David Bass presents evidence of substantial error in students» eligibility for free or reduced - price school meals.

(check the facts, Winter 2010), David Bass presents evidence of substantial error in students» eligibility for free or reduced - price school meals through the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), citing a recent Mathematica study that found most errors result from misreporting of household income.

For the 2015 - 16 school year, income eligibility for reduced - price meals was 185 percent of the federal poverty line and 130 percent for free meals.

Also, the income eligibility limit for reduced - price meals is higher than for the programs that are used to determine which students are Identified Students.

Moreover, the vast majority of students at community eligibility schools who would not have met the strict criteria for free or reduced - price school meals are nonetheless low - income.

Community eligibility has significant potential to expand access to school meals for students from low - income families while reducing administrative burdens by eliminating school meal applications.

Likewise, it is critical that a desire for data traditionally gathered from meal applications does not stand in the way of districts and schools implementing community eligibility, which can help support educational achievement, reduce hunger, and improve children's nutrition and health.

The data included students» race, nativity, immigration history, grade, borough of residence, attendance, eligibility for free and reduced - price school meals, and participation in limited English proficiency (LEP) and special education programs.

This program structure operated for over 30 years serving only children who met income eligibility guidelines (qualified for free or reduced meals).

This program provides facilities rent and lease assistance to charter schools, which do not have existing district facilities to use, that are serving some of California's neediest students (as defined by eligibility for the Free / Reduced - Price Meals Program).

The Community Eligibility Option (CEO) attempts to reduce administrative burdens on schools and districts by allowing schools, groups of schools, or local education agencies with more than 40 % of students qualifying for «direct certification» of FRL eligibility to provide free meals to their entire student body, and to cease reporting data disaggregated by FRL eEligibility Option (CEO) attempts to reduce administrative burdens on schools and districts by allowing schools, groups of schools, or local education agencies with more than 40 % of students qualifying for «direct certification» of FRL eligibility to provide free meals to their entire student body, and to cease reporting data disaggregated by FRL eeligibility to provide free meals to their entire student body, and to cease reporting data disaggregated by FRL eligibilityeligibility.

To receive a free or reduced price meal, households must meet income eligibility requirements.

Two schools have 100 % free and reduced price meal eligibility.

It does this by using data for individual students, such as scores on standardized tests, special education and English - learner status, eligibility for free and reduced - price meals (a proxy for poverty), and race and ethnicity.

Local school officials have adopted the following family size income criteria for determining eligibility for free and reduced price meals and will offer meals to students that qualify according to the standards below:

As opposed to collecting individual applications for free and reduced - price meals, the CEP allows LEAs and schools meeting the eligibility requirements to use information provided from other direct certification programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Temporary Assistance Program for Needy Families (TANF).

How does eligibility for free or reduced price meals affect how we fund public schools in Connecticut?

In addition, an algorithm was developed to take into account family eligibility for public assistance, eligibility for free or reduced - cost school meals, and employment status of the mother and the father [19].