Not exact matches
Is the majority of the initial (before feedback) atmosphere
heating resulting from increased CO-2
reduced by the fact that the majority (W - Sq - M at low latitude) of
outgoing radiation is in the latitudes most saturated by water vapor?
A
heat recovery ventilator
reduces energy use by transferring the
heat or cold from the
outgoing stale air and using it to condition the incoming fresh air.
Lindzen and some scientists at NASA have offered a hypothesis that warming in the tropics will
reduce high - cirrus cloudiness there, which will increase
outgoing heat more than it increases the
heating effect of incoming sunlight.
To be energy or more properly,
heat transferred, the one - way upwelling radiation from the surface absorbed by the air should be
reduced by subtraction of the down - welling radiation of the air absorbed by the surface Note that by subtraction of the (about 20 W / m ² in global average) flow surface to cosmos of both terms of GH, GH expression becomes GH = (radiation from the surface absorbed by the air) minus (
outgoing longwave radiation from the air) which has absolutely no physical sense!
On top of the ocean
heating, we can look at the
outgoing radiation from the atmosphere, by satellite, to see that frequencies associated with water vapor and CO2 have
reduced upward emissions.