May 19, 2016 by Brett Kittredge As the United States marks the 62nd anniversary of the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education decision which declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional, a new study looks at the effect school choice has had in
reducing racial segregation in schools.
Not exact matches
The use of interdistrict - choice programs is unlikely to increase most students» educational opportunities significantly, a new report concludes, despite recent attention to the idea as a means of
reducing economic and
racial segregation and giving students
in low - performing public
schools a chance to find a better
school.
In addition, Walker's budget eliminates Chapter 220 — the only educational program in Milwaukee designed to reduce racial segregation in public schools and improve equal opportunity for students of colo
In addition, Walker's budget eliminates Chapter 220 — the only educational program
in Milwaukee designed to reduce racial segregation in public schools and improve equal opportunity for students of colo
in Milwaukee designed to
reduce racial segregation in public schools and improve equal opportunity for students of colo
in public
schools and improve equal opportunity for students of color.
With the establishment of the Sheff standard for
racial integration
in 2008, magnet
schools have become the state's primary method for
reducing racial segregation and promoting integration within the Greater Hartford Region public
school system.
The REAL TRUTH is that while Connecticut spends massive amount of money to fulfill its federal and state constitutional mandate of
REDUCING segregation, Connecticut charter
schools are using public money to actually INCREASE
racial segregation in Connecticut!
While the State of Connecticut spends hundreds of millions of dollars every year to
reduce racial isolation
in our urban
school districts, as required by Connecticut's Constitution and Courts, Governor Dannel Malloy is pumping more than $ 100 million a year into Connecticut Charter
Schools despite the fact that they have become a primary vehicle for the
segregation of our public
school system.
Yet, as the report goes on to note, these state officials, those with the express obligation to
reduce segregation, have consistently chosen to do nothing to prevent charter
school segregation and its effects, including exacerbating
racial, ethnic and economic imbalance
in the host
school districts.
She argues that
school reformers assume that
schools can do more to address poverty than is realistic, that accountability policies encourage narrowing of the curriculum and teaching to the test, that vouchers have accumulated no significant evidence of effectiveness, that «virtual charter
schools» are a ripoff of taxpayers, and that there are more effective policy solutions that are far from test - based accountability and «
school choice» policies: social services for poor families, early childhood education, protecting the autonomy of teachers and elected
school boards,
reducing class sizes, eliminating for - profit companies and chains from operating charter
schools, and aggressively fighting
racial and socioeconomic
segregation in schools.