Despite being
a reductionist argument, I think it comes down to how men see male relationships versus female relationships.
Neither is it a functionalist or
reductionist argument for the existence of religion, as one might expect from disciples of Ernst Troeltsch, Claude Levi - Strauss, or Clifford Geertz.
Above all, Rossano sees religion primarily in terms of relationships, which apparently explains why it persists even in the face of today's atheistic
reductionist arguments.
Not exact matches
[Dennett's] limited and superficial book reads like a caricature of a caricature - for if Richard Dawkins has trivialized Darwin's richness by adhering to the strictest form of adaptationist
argument in a maximally
reductionist mode, then Dennett, as Dawkins» publicist, manages to convert an already vitiated and improbable account into an even more simplistic and uncompromising doctrine.
Argument:
Reductionist science may be over, but a new kind of emergent science is just beginning.
The purpose of this perspective, then, is to provide a logical
argument for a new approach to classifying human disease that both appreciates the uses and limits of reductionism and incorporates the tenets of the non ‐
reductionist approach of complex systems analysis.
The respondents» counter
argument (dubbed a «
reductionist fallacy» by the appellants) was that nought, plus nought, plus nought, still equalled nought.