Sentences with phrase «refer parties interested»

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

«A mere rebellion by a small interest group within the party can not be referred to factionalisation of the party, `' the statement said.

«Independent expenditures tend not to be particularly as big in New York as say the LLC Loophole or housekeeping accounts,» said Blair Horner of The New York Public Interest Research Group, referring to political party accounts not subject to the same campaign finance limits as candidate campaigns.

He described the period around the 2000 elections as being active for Greens in the state and referred to Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins» promising showing in the 2014 gubernatorial election as proof of renewed interest in the pParty candidate Howie Hawkins» promising showing in the 2014 gubernatorial election as proof of renewed interest in the partyparty.

And he also referred back to the party's record in the 1980s, renewing a pledge to emulate Margaret Thatcher's administrations in taking on vested interests, including «union barons that threaten another spring of discontent», teachers and big business.

«As I'm sure you are aware, the local district attorney would have a conflict of interest in this matter, involving as it does the leadership of his own party,» Smyth wrote in an Oct. 24 letter, referring to Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel Abelove.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), hereafter referred to as the «Agencies,» are engaging interested parties in a discussion on the use of programmatic approaches to conduct environmental reviews, as required by Section 1305 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP - 21; 23 U.S.C. 139 (b)(3)-RRB-.

Publishers, such as eBay Inc., WebMD, Cars.com, Forbes.com, and the Newspaper Consortium (our strategic partnership with a consortium of more than 20 leading United States («U.S.») newspaper publishing companies), are a subset of our distribution network of third - party entities (referred to as «Affiliates») and are primarily Websites and search engines that attract users by providing content of interest, presented on Web pages that have space for advertisements.

Loans refer to when one party gives money to another on the condition that it be paid back, typically with interest, at a certain time in the future.

Home - equity refers to your home's fair market value minus any outstanding loans or interest that may represent a 3rd party's ownership of your home.

In a rare breed like mine with very few available litters nationwide each year, it is not reasonable to require that buyers visit the breeder or pick up their puppy themselves, however the breeder should offer that people visit or in my case, I often refer interested parties to breeders closer to them to meet the breed even if the other breeder doesn't have a litter or the person just has the dogs and isn't a breeder.

We do not screen adopters for other organizations and will simply refer interested parties to you for screening.

The term «aggregated data» refers to general information regarding Site visitors and users that relates specifically to the Site, e.g. traffic patterns, number of visits to certain pages, visits from other web sites or to third - party web sites linked to the Site, use of particular services and interest in services, information or features of the Site or other parties made available through or found at the Site.

As usual, I refer the genuinely interested party to the Charney Report, 1979, which predates any post-WWII global surface warming and so can not be accused of taking a post hoc position.

Hi Don, On another note, given the state of affairs these days, I think that it would be a great idea for you and / or Dr. Lemons to write a guest post on ClimateProgress regarding the question of NVCD, in which you can pose the question, discuss it briefly, and refer interested parties to your more in - depth article and also to other work on the subject.

The court acknowledged that this situation fell squarely within the «Non-Waivable Red List» of the International Bar Association's Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, which refers to situations where «the arbitrator or his or her firm regularly advises the party, or an affiliate of the party, and the arbitrator or his or her firm derives significant financial income therefrom.»

In this respect, the referring court also has an important role to play in preserving the urgent interests of the parties.

Such active and even aggressive participation can have no other effect than to discredit the impartiality of an administrative tribunal either in the case where the matter is referred back to it, or in future proceedings involving similar interests and issues or the same parties.

Assets and property interests owned by a party, often referred to in divorce cases as «the marital estate», meaning assets subject to division between husband and wife.

The reports and statements referred to in this Article shall be made available to interested parties free of charge.

(i) Whether the applicant has provided evidence sufficient to raise a valid, bona fide or reasonable claim; (ii) Whether the applicant has established a relationship with the third party from whom the information is sought such that it establishes that the third party is somehow involved in the acts complained of; (iii) Whether the third party is the only practicable source of the information available; (iv) Whether the third party can be indemnified for costs to which the third party may be exposed because of the disclosure, some [authorities] refer to the associated expenses of complying with the orders, while others speak of damages; and (v) Whether the interests of justice favour the obtaining of disclosure.

A quick introduction for those of you who don't know about CLOC: CLOC is the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium — a volunteer - driven group made up of legal ops professionals (both lawyers and professional staff) who carry the full - time and multidisciplinary responsibilities of law practice management in legal departments; there's also a robust group of interested parties that orbit around the CLOC membership community — ALSPs (alternative legal service providers) and law firms, consultants, legal tech innovators, and managed service companies; the collective group that many CLOC - ers, led by co-founder Connie Brenton, refer to as their partnering «ecosystem.»

It's the same concept involved when a criminal defense lawyer refers a client or a potential client to a family law colleague because the party involves is interested in filing for divorce.

If the tribunal considers that a party to a proceeding does not have a relevant interest in the proceeding it may refer to the Federal Court the question of whether the party should cease to be a party to the proceeding.

Consequently, the NNTT considered each factor, and referred to the preamble of the Native Title Act and the principle that a beneficial construction should be given to the provisions of the Act which are designed to protect native title rights and interests or which otherwise reflect other interests and concerns of native title parties and Aboriginal people so as to give the fullest relief which the fair meaning of the language will allow.

The tribunal should refer to the Federal Court for determination of the question of whether a party should be removed if it considers that a party does not have a relevant interest.

I believe that it should, and that the test should be reworked to refer to whether or not the person's interests are likely to be significantly affected by a determination if they cease to be a party.13

A legal relationship and method referencing the ownership of real property by which one person mutually holds legal title to property with other persons in such a way that when one of the joint owners dies, the remaining party (s) owns an undivided interest in the entire property; more legally referred to as Tenancy in Common with rights of survivorship.

(2) The interested person must file a notice in the prescribed form in the court hearing the proceedings, and serve a true copy of the notice upon the party referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b).

Sometimes, seller concessions are referred to Interested Party Contributions (IPC), and sometimes they're referred to as Seller Contributions or a Seller Assist.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained