You
reference one
of those «awesome» (awful) pieces
of scripture that goes totally against the humanistic (secular / religioius) common sense, and I think only makes our sense if we separate esoteric (salvational)
issues form
social gospel and
social justice.
We regularly act in
references to the Court
of Justice of the European Union, as well as in the UK courts and tribunals when EU law
issues arise — for instance in judicial review claims, tax and
social security tribunals, employment tribunals and damages actions.
It can be said that since
Justice Lamer's fateful decision in the Motor Vehicle Branch
reference, s. 7 has become, particularly in recent years, the single most fertile source for the discovery
of new rights and the de facto constitutionalization
of political and
social issues.
Also Anna L. Endter has just published an article analyzing the
social justice applications of UELMA: Authentication of Online State Primary Legal Resources as a Social Justice Issue: The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act and How It Can Benefit Pro Se Litigants, in 31 Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 293 - 311 (
social justice applications of UELMA: Authentication of Online State Primary Legal Resources as a Social Justice Issue: The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act and How It Can Benefit Pro Se Litigants, in 31 Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 293 - 311
justice applications
of UELMA: Authentication
of Online State Primary Legal Resources as a
Social Justice Issue: The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act and How It Can Benefit Pro Se Litigants, in 31 Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 293 - 311 (
Social Justice Issue: The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act and How It Can Benefit Pro Se Litigants, in 31 Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 293 - 311
Justice Issue: The Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act and How It Can Benefit Pro Se Litigants, in 31 Legal
Reference Services Quarterly, 293 - 311 (2012).