Here are the ETFs weights in the constrained
reference portfolio over the same analysis time span:
The following chart shows the percentage ETF weights in the fund's
reference portfolio over the same analysis period:
The following chart shows fluctuations of ETF weights in
the reference portfolio over the same analysis period:
The following chart shows ETF weights in the fund's
reference portfolio over the same analysis interval:
The following chart illustrates changes of ETF weights in
the reference portfolio over the same analysis period:
The following chart shows the ETF weights in
the reference portfolio over the same analysis period:
The composition of
the reference portfolio over this shorter period was different from the previous one, although the top - six equivalent positions also accounted for more than 80 % of holdings.
Not exact matches
Over the same analysis period, SIZE outperformed THRK, the dominant position in its
reference portfolio, in terms of a slightly larger annualized return, as well as higher Sharpe and Sortino ratios:
Since late 2014, the ETF failed to add value
over its
reference portfolio that had a slightly lower volatility.
In essence, the
reference ETF
portfolio embodies average core exposures of the analyzed fund to various factors, indices and strategies
over the analysis period.
The following chart and corresponding statistics show the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same period:
The following chart with related statistics shows the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same evaluation period:
The following chart and statistics show the composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same period:
The following chart with related statistics shows the composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same ten - year period:
The following chart with accompanying statistics illustrates the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the same five - year period:
The following chart with associated statistics shows the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the same evaluation period:
In sum, the PNC Multi-Factor Small Cap Core Fund significantly outperformed its
reference ETF
portfolios only
over a relatively short period of time in its history.
In conclusion,
over typical analysis periods the Amana Growth Fund failed to add value with respect to its
reference ETF
portfolios of comparable volatility.
The following chart and statistics illustrate the constant
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same five - year period:
The following chart with associated statistics depicts the static
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same analysis period:
The following chart with related statistics shows the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the same analysis period:
The following chart with associated statistics illustrates the fixed
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same shorter period:
Over the most recent three and five years, the T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund failed to add a significant amount of value when compared to a static
reference ETF
portfolio.
Over the three - year period through July 2016, the fund still failed to add a meaningful amount of value over its reference ETF portfo
Over the three - year period through July 2016, the fund still failed to add a meaningful amount of value
over its reference ETF portfo
over its
reference ETF
portfolio:
A similar analysis
over the five - year period through July 2016 reveals that the fund cumulatively returned 18.8 % compared to 28 % for its
reference ETF
portfolio that had a slightly lower volatility.
The following chart shows the percentage weights of exchange - traded products (ETPs) in the
reference portfolio for the fund
over the same analysis period:
The following chart shows the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the same analysis period:
Over the entire seven - year period, the annualized standard deviation was 13.6 % compared to 12.9 % for the
reference portfolio.
The following chart illustrates the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same evaluation period:
The return correlation of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the entire evaluation period was 0.16 with VTI and 0.58 with BND.
An investor managing this
portfolio would generally be better off investing in the
reference ETF
portfolio instead, at least
over this evaluation interval.
Over the recent three - and five - year periods, the MFS Global Equity Fund added little to no value over its reference ETF portfol
Over the recent three - and five - year periods, the MFS Global Equity Fund added little to no value
over its reference ETF portfol
over its
reference ETF
portfolios.
Over the five - year period, the fund added very little value over its reference ETF portfolio of comparable volatil
Over the five - year period, the fund added very little value
over its reference ETF portfolio of comparable volatil
over its
reference ETF
portfolio of comparable volatility.
The fund added a miniscule amount of value
over the static
reference portfolio but did so at the expense of slightly higher volatility (standard deviation of returns).
The following chart shows the static composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the ten - year evaluation period (it should be noted that the
reference portfolio somewhat differs between the two analysis periods):
The following chart depicts changes of ETF weights in the
reference portfolio for the fund
over the same analysis period:
In the simplest application of Alpholio ™'s patented methodology, both the membership and weights of ETFs in the
reference portfolio for the analyzed fund are fixed
over the entire analysis period.
Compared to fixed
reference ETF
portfolios, the Tocqueville International Value Fund added a modest amount of value
over the past five and ten years.
The following chart with associated statistics shows the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same analysis period:
Unlike with other approaches, both the membership (which ETPs) and weights (proportion of value of each ETP in overall assets) in our
reference portfolio can change
over time.
The following chart and statistics show the static
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same three - year analysis period:
Overall, the fund added virtually no value
over its
reference portfolio of comparable volatility.
The following chart with accompanying statistics presents the constant composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the same evaluation period:
The final chart and statistics present the composition of the
reference ETF
portfolio over the same three - year period:
In sum,
over the past 10 years the Wasatch Micro Cap Fund failed to outperform its
reference ETF
portfolio or add meaningful value
over a market - cap ETF.
The fund added no value
over its
reference ETF
portfolio, which had a slightly lower volatility.
The fund cumulatively returned
over 20.5 % less than its
reference ETF
portfolio of lower volatility.
The ETF membership and weights in the
reference portfolio are both fixed
over the entire analysis period.
Over the five years through July 2016, this ETP also added little value vs. its
reference ETF
portfolio.
The following chart with related statistics illustrates the fixed
reference ETF
portfolio for the fund
over the same analysis period: