Sentences with phrase «references to the law commission»

A basic search on the internet reveals 512 references made in UK academic journals during the calendar year 2011, and our monitoring service picked up 658 references to the Law Commission from the media during 2011 — 12.

Not exact matches

«This directive draws it strength with appointment letter given to you dated 26 August 2009, under reference NDHQ paragraph which reads «You will be subject to the Civil Service Law 1993 (PNDCL327) the Public Service Commission Act 1994 (Act 482) and any statutory instruction made there under and other general or department instructions as well as administrative directive for the time being enforce», the letter said.

The majority leader post is less significant, though it is referenced in law and carries with it some appointments to various boards and commissions.

«The order clearly references the Public Officers Law, and that is what we used to define policymaking boards, commissions, and instrumentalities,» she said.

The European Commission has published «interpretative guidelines» for the flight delay law, referencing case law in a bid to clarify some of the grey areas, but these are not legally binding on the airlines.

In particular, according to the European Commission's guidance, the concept of dependence in case of family members of third - country nationals should be interpreted with reference to the analogous concept in EU free movement law.

The link above goes directly to the University of Calgary's Virtual Law Library, which includes information about: Legislation; Courts; Legal Databases; Legal Periodicals; Aboriginal Law; Human Rights; International Law; Natural Resources, Energy & the Environment; Trade and Commerce; Government Bodies; Law Reform Commissions; Reference Sources; Research Guides; Selected Websites; Legal Profession; Law for the Layperson; Law Libraries; and Law Publishers.

As noted above, the European Commission's brief makes two basic arguments, the first substantive and the second procedural: (1) that the jurisdictional limits of the ATS should be defined by reference to international law, in particular that the US should allow universal civil jurisdiction only in cases where universal criminal jurisdiction would normally apply; and (2) that the US's exercise of universal civil jurisdiction must be constrained by the procedural limits imposed by international law, in particular by an exhaustion requirement.

It seems that the CJEU would view third country law as an issue of fact to be proved (see in this regard the article by Judge Rodin in the current issue of the American Journal of Comparative Law), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union llaw as an issue of fact to be proved (see in this regard the article by Judge Rodin in the current issue of the American Journal of Comparative Law), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union lLaw), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union llaw) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union lawlaw.

The Dutch reference for a preliminary ruling is based on the following facts: A report commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture had opined that the lending of e-books did not fall within the scope of application of Directive 2006/115 (as transposed into Dutch law) and, as a result, libraries could not benefit from an exception to the exclusive lending right to lend e-books to the public.

This difficulty is compounded by the fact that traditional laws and customs are transmitted orally from generation to generation, so evidence of these may be restricted or inadmissible under the hearsay rule.137 This is an issue that has been identified by the Australian Law Reform Commission in its Review of the Uniform Evidence Act 1995.138 The Commission proposes that the uniform Evidence Acts should be amended to provide an exception to the hearsay and opinion evidence rules for evidence relevant to Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander traditional laws and customs.139 The Commission also observed that there are strong arguments that the NTA should be amended as the relevant provision does not provide sufficient guidance on or certainty on the admissibility of evidence in native title proceedings.140 However, legislative amendment to the NTA falls outside the terms of reference of this review.

By reference to relevant international human rights norms, the Commission supports as correct in law the following findings of Justice North in the Full Court relation to the conceptualisation of native title:

44 The Australian Law Reform Commission report was confined by the terms of reference to modes of recognition consistent with human rights.

For example, in the Australian Law Reform Commission's reference on Aboriginal Customary Law, male field officers conducting consultations commented on their own failure to engage the views of Aboriginal women.

To avoid any public misconceptions, diligent, Real Estate Boards / Associations, for some time, have insisted that a Broker who engages in marketing by using commission comparisons, also must use a «Disclaimer» to avoid any public misconceptions, such as: «any reference to real estate commissions (such as 6 %) is done strictly for comparison purposes only, as real estate commissions are negotiable by law.&raquTo avoid any public misconceptions, diligent, Real Estate Boards / Associations, for some time, have insisted that a Broker who engages in marketing by using commission comparisons, also must use a «Disclaimer» to avoid any public misconceptions, such as: «any reference to real estate commissions (such as 6 %) is done strictly for comparison purposes only, as real estate commissions are negotiable by law.&raquto avoid any public misconceptions, such as: «any reference to real estate commissions (such as 6 %) is done strictly for comparison purposes only, as real estate commissions are negotiable by law.&raquto real estate commissions (such as 6 %) is done strictly for comparison purposes only, as real estate commissions are negotiable by law.»