Sentences with phrase «referred by a court»

Some addicts enter drug treatment programs after being referred by a court following an arrest for possessing drugs or for committing a crime to support their addictions.

In cases that are not referred by court order, mediation is voluntary for all parties, and either party can end the mediation session at any time.

Couples in dispute on certain minor issues relating to parenting time, access schedules, the management of a child's health care, religious and educational instruction, and general communication between parents, can be referred by a court to a Parenting Coordinator who can assist with the resolution.

The first case (Samira Achbita and Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v. G4S Secure Solutions NV), referred by the Court of Cassation in Belgium, concerns a Muslim woman, who worked for G4S as a receptionist and who was permanently contracted out to a third party.

Students in the classroom include traffic offenders, repeat traffic offenders, adults, and teenagers, and those who have and those who have not been referred by a court.

The Level 1 Washington 4 - Hour Defensive Driving course — For drivers who have received a traffic ticket, and have been referred by the court to take a basic 4 - hour course.

If I have been referred by the court to take a defensive driving course, am I eligible to take the DrivingUniversity.com on - line course?

No, Arizona defensive driving courses are mandated or referred by the court and therefore can not be taken voluntarily for point reduction.

Whether you've been referred by the court or are simply looking for a point reduction, our Alaska online defensive driving courses are fully approved by the Alaska DMV to meet your specific needs and requirements.

Choose this option when you sign up for the course if you have received a traffic ticket in Nevada and have been referred by the court to take a traffic school course.

Students taking this online course include traffic offenders, repeat traffic offenders, adults, and teenagers, and those who have and those who have not been referred by a court.

Choose this option when you sign up for the course if you have received a traffic ticket in Colorado and have been referred by the court to take a traffic school course.

Choose this course if you have received a traffic ticket in Georgia and have been referred by the court to take a defensive driving course.

Colorado Driver Improvement Course... $ 29.95 Complete this course if you have received a traffic ticket in Colorado and have been referred by the court to take a driver improvement course.

Alaska Defensive Driving Course - Court Referred... $ 25.95 Complete this course if you have received a traffic ticket in the Alaska and have been referred by the court to take a defensive driving course.

Take this course if you have received a traffic ticket or have been referred by the court to take a TX Defensive Driving course.

Students who wishes to take this course may include traffic offenders, repeat traffic offenders, adults and teenagers, and those who have and those who have not been referred by a court.

This Florida Traffic School Online course is for those who have received a second offense traffic ticket in Florida State and have been referred by their court to take a longer course.

Arizona Defensive Driving Course (Diversion Attendance) Complete this course if you have received a traffic ticket in Arizona and have been referred by the court to take a defensive driving course.

Ticket Dismissal Course + Audio Choose this course if you have received a traffic ticket in Texas and have been referred by the court to take a defensive driving course.

Licensees facing a CA drivers license suspension who have been referred by a court may participate in this program once in a 18 - month period, after which a completion receipt is issued.

To be eligible for traffic school, drivers must be referred by the court in their local jurisdiction.

Select this course if you received a TX traffic ticket or were referred by the court to attend traffic school and receive these FREE upgrades!

I was referred by the court for the 8 hour course and i'm glad I took it with Drivesafetoday.

If you've been referred by your court or have been ordered by a Florida Judge to complete an 8 - Hour Driver Improvement class, or if you've received a second ticket in the last 12 months, then this is the State - Approved course for you.

been referred by a court or ordered by a Florida Judge to complete an 8 - Hour Driver Improvement class, or 2.

Enrollment though is only for those referred by court, and is usually not an option for drivers with suspended license or those convicted of serious violations that require license suspensions.

To qualify for this type of program, drivers must be referred by the court in their case.

If you have received a traffic ticket in Arizona and have been referred by the court to take a defensive driving course.

Complete the New Mexico Defensive Driving Course if you have been referred by the court to take a driver improvement course to dismiss your citation.

The Delaware Aggressive Driver Course is for Delaware motorist that have been referred by the court to complete an Aggressive Driver course to satisfy an Aggressive Driver Violation.

Drivers who were referred by the court can take this course as well.

Beginning in 1984, he was a frequent arbitrator of cases referred by the court under the California Rules of Court.

They adopted two Colombian children and, over the years, were asked by social workers to take children from difficult backgrounds, and then children and young people referred by the courts.

The Vietnamese - speaking group ran over 15 weeks, involving men between the ages of 22 and 43, most of whom were referred by the court or government agencies.

Not exact matches

It is asking the Irish High Court to refer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which would then decide whether to ban the use of «model contracts» — common legal arrangements used by thousands of firms to transfer personal data outside the 28 - nation bloc.

«The battleground has shifted to the legal courts and the court of public opinion,» he said, referring to lawsuits filed by tribes and an effort planned by the Lakota People's Law Project to rally lawmakers and others in Washington, D.C., to their cause.

«We can not have people flowing into our country illegally, disappearing, and by the way never showing up for court,» he added, referring to «catch and release» immigration policies.

Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by HP Co. of the IRS private letter ruling and the tax opinions referred to above, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and / or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax - free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge.

The Enrollment Program also authorizes a superior court to have jurisdiction over enrollees by allowing it to «appoint a receiver, monitor, conservator, or other designated fiduciary or officer of the court for a defendant or the defendant's assets,» as well as authorizes the Commissioner of Business Oversight to «include in civil actions claims for ancillary relief, including restitution and disgorgement, on behalf of a person injured, as well as attorney's fees and costs, and civil penalties of up to $ 25,000» for up to four years after the purported violation occurred and «refer evidence regarding violations of the bill's provisions to the Attorney General, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the United States Department of the Treasury, or the district attorney of the county in which the violation occurred, who would be authorized, with or without this type of a reference, to institute appropriate proceedings.»

The co-host of Fox's «The Five» was referring to a suit brought by the American Humanist Association in Massachusetts, where the state's Supreme Judicial Court heard a challenge to the pledge on Wednesday.

Many who hated Scalia's rulings could not help but be entertained by his razor - sharp writing, which he used especially in his dissenting opinions to carve up the majority's reasoning (my favorite is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where among other things he referred to the majority's «Nietzschean vision of us unelected, life - tenured judges — leading a Volk who will be «tested by following»» the Court's rulings obediently).

The Court, if it had wished to rely upon Jefferson to determine the true and original intent of the First Amendment, could have served themselves and the American people well by referring to Jefferson's warning to Judge William Johnson regarding the de-ter-min-ation of the original intent of a statute or a con - st - itu - tion On every question of con - struc - tion, carry ourselves back to the time when the Con - st - itu - tion was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.»

Our 1996 symposium on judicial usurpation and subsequent articles were criticized for being alarmist; but the Florida Supreme Court changed many minds, and I now note that even worthies such as George Will are using the feared R - word, referring to the «regime» of lawless law - making by judges.

When Americans — whether presidents, Supreme Court justices or ordinary citizens — refer to the «wall of separation» desired by the Founders, they not only perpetuate a historical inaccuracy; they unwittingly revive some of the most distasteful episodes in American history.

Viewing the carnage created by the Court, George Will referred to the Justices as «our robed masters.»

Our role is to look after the interests of children when cases are referred to us by the courts and we acknowledge that in the vast majority of private law cases this will be best served by preserving children's relationships with both parents.

The name «mandarin» refers to the bright orange robes worn by the Mandarins, who were public officials of the ancient Chinese court.

We refer to the company as Wyeth (or more fully, John Wyeth and Brother Ltd) as that is the company that was taken to court by Trading Standards in 2003 for breaking the law with an illegal SMA formula advertising campaign.

This conclusion is belied by the record, however, which shows that, contrary to the district court's assertion, a compositional difference does exist between milk from untreated cows and conventional milk («conventional milk,» as used throughout this opinion, refers to milk from cows treated with rbST).