Not exact matches
It adds that «approval or denial of the proposed project is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the rate of development in the
oil sands, or on the amount of heavy
crude oil refined in the Gulf Coast area.»
The refinery will feature state - of - the - art design, specifically for processing Alberta
oil sands heavy
crude oil, and engineered to be the cleanest upgrading and
refining site in the world.
Based on information and analysis about the North American
crude transport infrastructure (particularly the proven ability of rail to transport substantial quantities of
crude oil profitably under current market conditions, and to add capacity relatively rapidly) and the global
crude oil market, the draft Supplemental EIS concludes that approval or denial of the proposed Project is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the rate of development in the
oil sands, or on the amount of heavy
crude oil refined in the Gulf Coast area.
Designed to carry
crude oil from Canadian tar
sands to the
refining centers of Texas, the pipeline would bisect North America, from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico.
An analysis of the US
refining sector, based on linear programming (LP) modeling, finds that
refining plausibly high volumes of Canadian
oil sands crudes in US refineries in 2025 would lead to a modest increase in refinery CO2 emissions (ranging between 5.4 % to 9.3 %) from a 2010 baseline, depending upon... Read more →
«The CO2 numbers [in the
oil sands] sound frightening when only the production and
refining are taken into account... Yet once the
oil is burned, a variety of sources say the total lifecycle impact of
oil sands relative to the average
crude used in the U.S. is much smaller, including the Council on Foreign Relations (17 percent higher emissions) and Cambridge Energy Research Associates (5 - 15 percent).»
Environmentalists mistakenly think that blocking the Keystone pipeline will prevent
crude oil, derived from Canada's
oil sands, from being extracted and from being conveyed into the U.S. to be
refined into gasoline, asphalt, and other products that are important to the transportation and manufacturing sectors.
A postscript to our post explaining that the
crude oil the Keystone XL pipeline would deliver is comparable to other heavy crudes already being refined in the U.S.: Oil sands crude would replace other heavy oils — most significantly, crude currently imported from Venezue
oil the Keystone XL pipeline would deliver is comparable to other heavy
crudes already being
refined in the U.S.:
Oil sands crude would replace other heavy oils — most significantly, crude currently imported from Venezue
Oil sands crude would replace other heavy oils — most significantly,
crude currently imported from Venezuela.
In its report, EPA seemingly compliments the State Department for confirming that Canadian tar
sands oil is carbon intensive when compared to other heavy
crudes, due to increased emissions associated with extracting and
refining it.
In fact, State Department officials recognized that progress in
oil sands development has led to Canadian
crude oil from
oil sands that is «similar in composition and quality to the
crude oils currently transported in pipelines in the U.S. and being
refined in Gulf Coast refineries.»
The Harper government is lobbying heavily to have President Obama approve the Keystone XL pipeline that would carry 830,000 barrels per day of
oil -
sands bitumen to the vast
refining complex on the U.S. Gulf and would ease the delivery bottlenecks that have driven down Canadian
crude prices.
The gut - check issue for McKibben and his supporters — thousands of whom turned out for a mass demonstration in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 17 — is the Keystone XL pipeline, a 3,400 - mile pipe proposed by
oil infrastructure company TransCanada that will allow
crude oil extracted from the tar
sands of Alberta, in southern Canada, to be
refined on the Gulf of Mexico.