«This raises the intriguing possibility that there might be a mosaic of honeyguide
cultural variation across Africa, that
reflects that of their human partners,» Spottiswoode said.
These differences may be explained in part by differences in questionnaire administration methods (eg, personal interviews vs self administration), questionnaire content, target populations, or definitions and severity of the violence assessed; however, such differences may also
reflect true
variation and
cultural differences in violence perpetration.1 4 Standardised methodologies for assessing intimate partner violence (IPV) may help to enhance the reliability of results obtained from such studies and aid in comparing prevalence rates from diverse settings.