Not exact matches
We've all seen those signs
in restaurants proclaiming, «we have the right
to refuse service to anyone, for any reason.»
I too would be outraged if his business was
in fact
REFUSING service to, or inany other way, discriminating against
anyone who didn't BELIEVE as he does!
I wonder if I, as an LGBT atheist, have the right
to refuse anyone wearing a religious symbol or mentioning god or their belief
in a god
in any way, have a right
to deny
service or assistance
to them since that is offensive
to me and a violation of my personal beliefs.
In sum, ONLINE BOOTY CALL.COM AND / OR MOBEZE reserves the right
to refuse service to anyone at any time, and
to remove any listings or any advertisements for any reason, and without notice.
IVIC reserves the right
to refuse service to anyone and
to make necessary changes
in speakers, fees, content or any other details of the program or
to cancel it without notice,
in which event the organization liability is solely
to refund all registration fees.
Angel of Hope reserves the right
to refuse adoption
services to anyone, at any time, for any reason, if we believe it is not
in the best interest of the animal.
In a post in that same thread, however, CIG's Ben Lesnick explained that Smart's refund is «the videogame equivalent of a «we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone» sign in a restaurant,» and said that while the studio does try to «work with backers who are facing hardships,» the money received through the crowdfunding campaign is being spent on making the game and, by implication, is thus not available to give back to anyone who wants i
In a post
in that same thread, however, CIG's Ben Lesnick explained that Smart's refund is «the videogame equivalent of a «we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone» sign in a restaurant,» and said that while the studio does try to «work with backers who are facing hardships,» the money received through the crowdfunding campaign is being spent on making the game and, by implication, is thus not available to give back to anyone who wants i
in that same thread, however, CIG's Ben Lesnick explained that Smart's refund is «the videogame equivalent of a «we reserve the right
to refuse service to anyone» sign
in a restaurant,» and said that while the studio does try to «work with backers who are facing hardships,» the money received through the crowdfunding campaign is being spent on making the game and, by implication, is thus not available to give back to anyone who wants i
in a restaurant,» and said that while the studio does try
to «work with backers who are facing hardships,» the money received through the crowdfunding campaign is being spent on making the game and, by implication, is thus not available
to give back
to anyone who wants it.
I suggest that a notary public who
refused his or her
services to someone on religious grounds would be subject
to discipline (if
anyone in Canada actually disciplined notaries — lawyer - notaries are exempt from regulation of any kind with respect
to their notarial function
in most of the country, so far as I know, BC being an exception.)
If
anyone knowingly provides any information of a false, untrue, inaccurate or incomplete nature, Drive Smart Driving School will have sufficient grounds and rights
to suspend or terminate the member
in violation of this aspect of the Agreement, and as such
refuse any and all current or future use of Drive Smart Driving School
Services, or any portion thereof.
In their statement, the cryptocurrency exchanges noted that «The lack of knowledge and regulatory clarity has given rise
to the fact that some banks, out of fear, misinformation or perhaps by strategy, are
refusing to provide their
services to anyone who has any relationship with any digital asset»