Not exact matches
The governor did not specify how he intended
to enforce his order other than by directing state and local agencies
to refuse emergency assistance and other
services to anyone who remained at the site.
I too would be outraged if his business was in fact
REFUSING service to, or inany other way, discriminating against
anyone who didn't BELIEVE as he does!
In a post in that same thread, however, CIG's Ben Lesnick explained that Smart's refund is «the videogame equivalent of a «we reserve the right
to refuse service to anyone» sign in a restaurant,» and said that while the studio does try
to «work with backers
who are facing hardships,» the money received through the crowdfunding campaign is being spent on making the game and, by implication, is thus not available
to give back
to anyone who wants it.
I suggest that a notary public
who refused his or her
services to someone on religious grounds would be subject
to discipline (if
anyone in Canada actually disciplined notaries — lawyer - notaries are exempt from regulation of any kind with respect
to their notarial function in most of the country, so far as I know, BC being an exception.)
«The lack of knowledge and regulatory clarity has given rise
to the fact that some banks, out of fear, misinformation or perhaps by strategy, are
refusing to provide their
services to anyone who has any relationship with any digital asset.»
In their statement, the cryptocurrency exchanges noted that «The lack of knowledge and regulatory clarity has given rise
to the fact that some banks, out of fear, misinformation or perhaps by strategy, are
refusing to provide their
services to anyone who has any relationship with any digital asset»