Sentences with phrase «regard to laws seem»

Without prejudice to other topics, in - depth discussions on the effective implementation of weapon reviews with regard to LAWS seem warranted.

Not exact matches

Regarding Roger Scruton's quarrel with Paul Griffiths about the relation of marriage to the state, Lord Stowell's analysis in Dalrymple v Dalrymple seems very apposite: Marriage in its origin is a contract of natural law; it may exist between two individuals of different sexes although....

What many people seem to be misplacing in regards to the gods and goddesses is that they all are the sons and daughters - in - law of God Almighty whose Holy Spirit is the vast Seas of the Nothingness regions that reaches ever so far away in the celestial domains and spirals ever inward towards the inner domains!

Even the point about what is best for other creatures, which may seem very modern, is not without foundation in Hebrew Scriptures in such passages as the law against taking the hen - bird as well as the eggs from the nest (Deut 22:6), or this saying from Proverbs: «A righteous man has regard for the life of his beast» (12:10), where, be it noted, the quality that makes a man considerate of his working animals is not prudence or good business sense but «righteousness,» a point all the more significant when we remember that in the Hebrew Scriptures one of the marks of righteousness is not mere evenhandedness but active favor to the weak and deprived.

I am constantly shaking my head at writers and media who seem not to understand the medical facts or science regarding birth control and because of that mislead readers about the truth about birth control and what it does and doesn't do and the truth around so - called religious objections as it applies to the health care law.

If the Court does not claim to act merely in its own name, but for the common good and the rule of law, how then should citizens regard the effort to link abortion with the legitimacy of the Court itself and thus, it would seem, with the legitimacy of our current political regime?

Telegram correspondent Matt Law doesn't seem to regard the Spaniard as highly as Newcastle fans and voiced his less than kind opinions about the relationship between the fans and the former Real Madrid manager on Twitter during the game.

How is it that the anti-EU press, the Department of Health and Tesco seem to be aligned in a story attacking the formula marketing law as draconian, when this same law is routinely flouted with regard to instore promotion and advertising with no prosecutions being brought?

Seems like a pretty ambiguous law, any foreign national that discusses politics with a US citizen is going to have an influence over the person they are talking to, I don't see why campaign donations should be some sort of separate category in this regard, seems absurd tSeems like a pretty ambiguous law, any foreign national that discusses politics with a US citizen is going to have an influence over the person they are talking to, I don't see why campaign donations should be some sort of separate category in this regard, seems absurd tseems absurd to me.

I don't know what the UK laws are regarding credit vs. debit fraud, but some sites I found seem to suggest that credit cards have fraud protection in the UK as well.

But if you buy a dog — regarded in law as «goods and chattels», these rules do not seem to be enforced.

Number Two — I have seen Bill in city council meeting regarding pet laws and he seems to have a good understanding of the problems — it would be interesting to see if he would follow through.

As a consolation prize seems in order, and many Trump climate appointees regard the law is the queen of the sciences, the UAH team could ask the Rev. Doctor Beisner to toss Judge's Stetson in the ring, for the Heartland Institute Evangelical Climate Scientist of the Year Award.

Perhaps Gelbspan has no direct current involvement in global warming political efforts, but regarding the question of where he is these days, the answer seems to indicate that his collective past efforts are worthy of deep professional level investigation in relation to all the current focus on using racketeering laws to persecute skeptic climate scientists and the organizations having any association with them.

With regard to the discussion concerning Kirchhoff's law, the issue seems convoluted to me, so I have put it aside.

I think it's definitely too early to tell, US Electoral Law seems to have been broken or bent enough to matter at first glance, but at the moment it's difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff in regard to the information being published.

With regard to the question of compatibility of the imposition of a residence condition with Articles 29 and 33 of the Directive, after having found that these Articles in principle require an equal treatment of all beneficiaries of international protection as regards the freedom of movement (Article 33) and a treatment that is equal to nationals of the relevant Member State in the matter of welfare benefits (Article 29), the Court concludes that a residence condition can still be imposed on beneficiaries of subsidiary protection status, if they are not in an objectively comparable situation with beneficiaries of other international protection status or nationals of the Member States as regards the objective pursued by the national law that seems to infringe on Articles 29 and 33 (point 54 of the judgment).

Perhaps most significantly, the Supreme Court seems to develop (or at least confirm) its own comprehensive «Solange (so long as)» doctrine regarding the primacy of EU law.

The UK government therefore seems to have two choices with regard to these EU Regulations: either engage in the painstaking and time - consuming process of cataloguing all of the EU Regulations which are effective in the UK's legal order and create either primary or secondary legislation to incorporate them; or instead declare that these Regulations are directly applicable in the UK's legal order as international law.

He contends convincingly that the consolidation of the Union's role in criminal law only makes the «need for an all - out criminal law policy... more acute than before» (page 59) and highlights six fundamental principles that the EU needs to address in order to clarify and legitimise further its action in the field; among the six, the call to pay attention to the principle of ultima ratio, coherence, subsidiarity and the requirement of a legitimate purpose seem particularly pertinent also in regard to the current debate concerning the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor.

It seems you can't go a day without reading about how law school enrollment is plummeting, big law firms are imploding, lawyers are flaming out faster than 4th of July fireworks, and the profession, once regarded as something to aspire to, now ranks, in the public's imagination, somewhere between human bug - eater and professional sociopath in terms of status.

«There seems to me to be room to question whether the ordinary rules of client privilege, appropriate enough in other circumstances, should apply to a law officer's opinion on the lawfulness of war; it is not unrealistic in my view to regard the public, those who are to fight and perhaps die, rather than the government, as the client.»

A perceptive follower of the development of the case - law on access to court and justice in general might have noticed that the less willing the Court of Justice to loosen up the constraints in regard of the locus standi for non-privileged applicants, the more generous it seems to be towards the actual acts which can be amenable to judicial review.

It seems that the CJEU would view third country law as an issue of fact to be proved (see in this regard the article by Judge Rodin in the current issue of the American Journal of Comparative Law), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union llaw as an issue of fact to be proved (see in this regard the article by Judge Rodin in the current issue of the American Journal of Comparative Law), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union lLaw), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union llaw) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union lawlaw.

And, I suppose there's some reason to consider there's some basis for believing the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal and the British Columbia Court of Appeal seem to have different views on the law regarding causation could be some basis for believing there's something about the law regarding causation that's a wee bit controversial (even accepting that the division of powers structure in the Constitution Act means that that conflict IS constitutional).

These are not contracts in any but the most tortured sense, and it seems to me to do harm to law generally to continue to regard them as such.

In this regard, there seems to be general agreement that the use of unauthorised personal data is unlawful in most domestic legal systems and under international law (it is at the very least a breach of the human right to privacy).

In that regard, Warner and Klobuchar's bill — a draft of which the public has not yet seen — seems just as unlikely to achieve the bipartisan support it will require to become law.

Currently, Japan doesn't seem to have any clear laws with regard to ICOs and the current Bitcoin payment regulation is not enough to cover the legal status of all ICO related activities.

[45] «In Yorta Yorta, Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ seem to have regarded common acknowledgement and observance of a body of laws and customs as a sufficient unifying factor.

You also seem to have a very biased view of the proponents of law and order, not to mention the front line officers, regarding them as the peoples» enemy.