Not exact matches
Through these efforts, the Institute has been able
to launch a new initiative for films and emerging media projects exploring stories related
to the urgent need for action with
regard to the environment, conservation and
climate change.
Even among the public that accepts the science of global
climate change, the dire circumstances we now face in this
regard are consistently downplayed, and the logical implications that follow from the scientific analysis of the necessity
to enact swift and aggressive measures
to combat
climate change are not followed
through either intellectually or politically.
The overall objective of the consultation was
to enable key regional stakeholders
to assess and,
through consensus, prioritize research needs
regarding public health adaptation
to social, environmental and
climate change impacts on vector - borne diseases in Africa.
However, uncertainties
regarding how future emissions translate into
climate change at global and regional levels remain significant, and therefore it is difficult
to draw robust conclusions
regarding whether a particular greenhouse gas stabilization pathway would or would not allow residual risk
to be successfully managed
through adaptation.
This post reviews the Cancun outcome
through an ethical lens in light of the overall responsibility of those nations that are exceeding their fair share of safe global emissions in
regard to their duties: (a)
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
to levels necessary
to prevent harm
to others, (b)
to reduce greenhouse gas emission
to levels consistent with what is each nation's fair share of total global emissions, and (c)
to provide financing for adaptation measures and other necessary responses
to climate change harms for those who are most vulnerable and least responsible for
climate change.
«70 % of U.S. television news segments have provided «balanced» coverage
regarding anthropogenic contributions
to climate change vis - à - vis natural radiative forcing, and there has been a significant difference between this television coverage and scientific consensus
regarding anthropogenic
climate change from 1996
through 2004.»
Through quantitative content analysis, results show that 70 % of U.S. television news segments have provided «balanced» coverage regarding anthropogenic contributions to climate change vis - à - vis natural radiative forcing, and there has been a significant difference between this television coverage and scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change from 1996 throug
Through quantitative content analysis, results show that 70 % of U.S. television news segments have provided «balanced» coverage
regarding anthropogenic contributions
to climate change vis - à - vis natural radiative forcing, and there has been a significant difference between this television coverage and scientific consensus
regarding anthropogenic
climate change from 1996
throughthrough 2004.
Here's where this «loophole of uncertainty» comes into play - because China has implemented actions that address
climate change through its Eleventh Five - Year Plan since 2005 and has internally funding all of its energy efficiency measures and mitigation actions (and furthermore hasn't asked for any funding with
regards to their 40 - 45 % reduction in carbon intensity by 2020 from 2005 levels), China would therefore be exempt from international MRV if this text is eventually agreed upon.
Again, this is a
climate scientist's counsel
to policymakers in the US Congress
to avoid rushing into policies
regarding global
climate change before thinking their consequences
through thoroughly.
Couple these statements with other ones made by Greenpeace
regarding the state of the oceans and the United Nations trying
to create a worldwide government
through their Peacekeeping efforts in order
to handle the unrest that
climate change will supposedly bring about, and you get a fear - based society that will believe what they're told out of panic.