Inasmuch as this history may go some way toward explaining the language in the Arizona legislation, it might also be
regarded as a counterpoint to the notion that pro-life lawmakers have collectively disregarded the language of the medical establishment when crafting legislation.
GCMs often play a conservative role
as a
counterpoint to speculation or idealized modeling
regarding «tipping points» or abrupt climate change, in favor of gradual, more linear climate response to external forcing.