Therefore I now
regard him as a troll and will treat him as such.
Not exact matches
I am also curious
as to what posting you are referencing in
regards to
trolling.
He insisted it would be moderated only to remove «offensive» comment, but admitted he plans to edit what are
regarded as pointless contributions: «If you get 100
trolls putting in mindless comments that are gumming up the system, then I am afraid we would edit them out.»
SecularAnimist, Fuller seems to occupy a position somewhere between journalist and
troll; I eventually came to
regard him
as a provocateur.
Dear Mark,
as you fight the good fight in defense of free speech did I miss a post
regarding The President's «
trolling?»
This means that voters were influenced by erroneous information
regarding opposing candidates
as well
as bots and
trolls.
Now, with
regard to your stated position on patent
trolls (
as seen in your previous artciles),
trolls are not the historical source of the problem.
«Participants indicated specific concerns
regarding intellectual property (such
as patent
troll risk, and the need for interoperability) and the co-chairs outlined some of the tools that could be used by the players to manage this risk.»
Bill Sorrell, Attorney General for the State of Vermont addressed The U.S. House of Representatives» Committee on Energy and Commerce
regarding patent
trolls, and specifically,
as I've commented on before, the need for States to be allowed to intervene on behalf of
troll targets.