He also has experience of advising both economic operators and public authorities in connection with EU Commission complaints and investigations
regarding alleged breaches of the EU procurement and State aid regimes.
Represented a national staffing company in a lawsuit
regarding alleged breaches of contract, breaches of fiduciary duty, wrongful termination, and fraud, resulting in a favorable settlement on the eve of trial.
Represented a major insurance company in defense of claims brought by a national association of insurance agents before the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
regarding alleged breaches of agency contracts.
Not exact matches
July 14, 2017 — / PR NEWSWIRE / - Ruby Corp. and Ruby Life Inc. (ruby), and a proposed class of plaintiffs, co-led by Dowd & Dowd, P.C., The Driscoll Firm, P.C., and Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, have reached a proposed settlement agreement resolving the class action lawsuits that were filed beginning July 2015 following a data
breach of ruby's computer network and subsequent release of certain personal information of customers of Ashley Madison, an online dating website owned and operated by Ruby Life Inc. (formerly Avid Dating Life Inc.) The lawsuits,
alleging inadequate data security practices and misrepresentations
regarding Ashley Madison, have been consolidated in a multi-district litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
The team also represented King Edward VI College in a claim brought by three lecturers with
regards to an
alleged breach of contract and unlawful salary deduction.
Defending technology company and its board of directors in multimillion dollar PA state court action brought by founder / consultant / shareholder
alleging claims for
breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of contract, and rescission; prosecuting action in NJ federal court on behalf of executive terminated in
breach of his employment agreement; defending companies and their majority owners in numerous state court actions throughout NY and NJ
alleging breach of contract and fraud; defending company in connection with DOL investigation
regarding misclassification of employees; defending health - tech entrepreneur in connection with DOL investigation
regarding unemployment insurance fraud; counseling global company and its US subsidiary in connection with various employment law matters; and negotiating numerous separation agreements.
(3) The jury may also --(a) consider the extent to which the evidence shows that there were attitudes, policies, systems or accepted practices within the organisation that were likely to have encouraged any such failure as is mentioned in subsection (2), or to have produced tolerance of it; (b) have
regard to any health and safety guidance that relates to the
alleged breach.
On February 14, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed an appeal in Cana International Distributing Inc. v. Standard Innovation Corporation, 2018 ONCA 145, which involved an
alleged breach of a contract for, among other things, the exclusive distribution rights in retail shops, drug stores and sex toy retail outlet stores
regarding a sex toy called «We - Vibe».
Represented a large healthcare provider in a lawsuit
alleging breach of a non-compete agreement
regarding the opening and operation of a newly - constructed emergency department; obtained dismissal of the non-compete claim and a favorable settlement for the client
In addition to dealing with the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to the
alleged breach of the order, we are assisting the client in responding to FSA concerns
regarding the client's systems and controls
In Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart, the firm represents the interests of the owners of Shoppers Drug Mart franchises in an action
alleging that Shoppers Drug Mart has
breached the terms of the Associate Agreement as well as its duty of good faith and statutory duty of fair dealing (where applicable) with
regards to how it has been operating the franchise system.
Probate litigation may be required when disputes arise
regarding will contests, trust disputes or an
alleged breach of fiduciary duty.
Mr. Hagen has represented management in collective bargaining, labor arbitrations, unfair labor practice charges, representation elections, collective bargaining, state court injunctions
regarding improper picketing, and hybrid lawsuits
alleging breach of a collective bargaining agreement and
breach of the fair duty of representation.
The claim
alleges that Shoppers Drug Mart has
breached certain terms of the Associate Agreement, as well as its statutory and common law duty of good faith and fair dealing
regarding the operation of the franchise system.
Served as lead counsel for the defendants and successfully defeated motion to certify California class in action filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
alleging false advertising and
breach of warranty by Fortune 500 defendant - retailer in
regard to sales of certain clothes dryer models.
He has brought and defended appeals in the Employment Appeal Tribunal; prosecutions by the HSE (
regarding multiple
alleged breaches of the Working Time Regulations) and a significant # 3 million status enquiry by HMRC.
In 2008 the US entrepreneur Mr Carl A. Sax, represented by Amsterdam & Partners, brought a claim against the city of St Petersburg, Rossiya Airlines and Pulkovo Airport (co-respondents) in an ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in Stockholm,
alleging breaches of the investment contract
regarding the development of a new international passenger terminal at Pulkovo International Airport in St Petersburg back in the 1990s.
Did the motion judge err in finding that the entire agreement clause in the parties» contract disposed of any claim
regarding the respondent's
alleged post-contractual misrepresentations and
breach of its overriding duty of honesty?