While family law is normally defined by each state's law, the rules
regarding child custody hearings are mostly uniform...
Not exact matches
The judge may issue an order granting temporary
custody to the selected parent for a trial period not to exceed six months
regarding the
custody of a
child who has reached the age of 11 but not 14 years where the judge
hearing the case determines such a temporary order is appropriate.
However, if one parent does not agree on the
child support amount, or there are other outstanding issues
regarding divorce or
custody, then there may need to be a
hearing with the family court.
The parties have the option of requesting temporary orders
hearing in a divorce in Arizona, where the court will issue temporary orders
regarding child support,
child custody, family support, things like that.
In a contested
custody hearing, the court must make specific findings
regarding all relevant factors and the reasons that make it in the best interests of the
children (Section 25 - 403 (B)-RRB-.
Except applications under article 814.9, no application that involves the interests of the parties and the interests of their
children may be
heard by the court if there is a dispute between the parties
regarding child custody, support due to a party or to the
children, the family patrimony or other patrimonial rights arising from the marriage or civil union, unless the parties have attended an information session on the mediation process and a copy of the mediator's report has been filed.
The guardian ad litem may make recommendations for the
custody arrangement and may also present evidence at the
hearing regarding what the guardian ad litem considers to be the best
custody and visitation structure from the
child's perspective.
At the
hearing, the court made orders
regarding child custody, visitation and
child support.
Any issues between the spouses
regarding marital assets, debts, and
child custody are resolved at a Separate Maintenance
Hearing, and the judge will grant Separate Maintenance.
Hearing both sides of a
custody dispute is an important part of ensuring that the court makes an informed decision
regarding your
child.
The family court in Shawnee county, KS has some serious issues with reacting impulsively and approving sole
custody by default because the other parent was not there... knowing they aren't dead, realizing that 2 notices were sent and returned with «not at this address» so parent was probably only absent because they never received word of this very important, life altering
hearing - not because they felt they were above the law as indicated via court records then to seal the final decision, the judge shouldve reviewed any past files taking note of any past complaints / concerns to the court
regarding alienating parent doing just that and automatically recommend a continuation and make clear that court was not to move forward until they get a hold of the absent parent and allow them their right to be there... because that would've been 100 % in the best interest of the
child.