Represented scores of individuals in lawsuits against their former employers
regarding claims of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation based on disability, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, race, and other protected classes and activities in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), California Family Rights Act (CFRA), Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), American Disabilities Act (ADA), and public policy.
Regarding the claim of discrimination in terms / conditions, the court found that factual issues precluded summary judgment.
Not exact matches
70 However, this has been construed non-substantively and
claims by individuals or groups,
claims against governments who remain inactive and
claims against private parties have been
regarded as impermissible.71 Nevertheless, the CEDAW committee has finally recognized violence against women as a type
of sex
discrimination, thus making states accountable for «private acts» if they fail to prevent, investigate or punish discriminatory acts
of violence.72
And
regarding White
claims of racial
discrimination in admissions hiring, what may seem like
discrimination is intentional action by institutions to create a student body that reflects the populace
of the country, he added.
Ms. Schreiber now focuses her practice on assisting employees
of businesses
of all sizes in
claims regarding workplace
discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, unpaid wages, and numerous other employment disputes.
In December 2016, he co-counseled the matter
of Melissa Bailey v. Randolph Police Department and achieved a favorable verdict on behalf
of Police Officer Bailey
regarding her
claims of hostile work environment and retaliation under the New Jersey Law Against
Discrimination.
It is clear that the EAT did not
regard its conclusion as representing a satisfactory state
of affairs, particularly where the joint or concurrent tortfeasors are at arms» length, eg as in Bullimore v Porthecary Witham Weld [2011] IRLR 18 where an ex-employer gave a damaging reference about the claimant to a prospective employer because the ex-employee had presented a sex
discrimination claim against them and the prospective employer withdrew the offer for the same reason, and in circumstances where CLIA 1978 applies to
discrimination claims brought in the ordinary courts.
Achieved dismissal
of hostile work environment, retaliation and breach
of implied contract
claims, and dismissal
of individual defendants (President and Vice President) in
discrimination / harassments case, establishing law in our jurisdiction
regarding personal liability
of supervisors.
Our firm successfully guides clients through these complex employment matters, and we also defend clients against
claims asserted by third parties (
regarding negligent hiring, supervision and retention, etc.) and employees (
discrimination, harassment and breach
of contract, etc.).
«Current developments in the law
regarding sexual harassment, cases involving the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Illinois Department
of Human Rights, Human Rights Commission, hostile work environment, retalitory discharge, employment law, and
discrimination involving gender, race, sexual orientation and Americans with Disabilities Act
claims.»
The kinds
of representation we provide involve: (1) litigation and appeals
regarding a wide variety
of legal issues; (2) employment disputes, including
discrimination claims and accusations
of noncompliance with wage and hour laws; (3) intellectual property matters
regarding patents, trademarks and copyright infringements; (4) commercial real estate matters; (5) business law disputes; and (6) alternative dispute resolution («ADR») matters, including mediation and arbitration cases.
Prior to this amendment, the law
regarding discrimination against transgender persons was somewhat uncertain, although in practice the BC Human Rights Tribunal generally accepted
claims by transgender people under the grounds
of «sex» and «sexual orientation.»
Advise other clients
regarding a variety
of employment issues and matters, including
discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, unemployment compensation, employment - related tort
claims, defamation
claims, stock option
claims, breach
of contract
claims, and non-compete issues.
Claims are divided into type A and type B; broadly speaking, type A claims (for example, statutory redundancy payments, unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract) are those which the Lord Chancellor regards as typically the more straightforward and accordingly the fees related to such claims are lower than those for type B claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
Claims are divided into type A and type B; broadly speaking, type A
claims (for example, statutory redundancy payments, unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract) are those which the Lord Chancellor regards as typically the more straightforward and accordingly the fees related to such claims are lower than those for type B claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
claims (for example, statutory redundancy payments, unlawful deductions from wages and breach
of contract) are those which the Lord Chancellor
regards as typically the more straightforward and accordingly the fees related to such
claims are lower than those for type B claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
claims are lower than those for type B
claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
claims (which include
discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing
claimsclaims).
We have assisted Finnair Plc in a court case
regarding industrial safety dispute and acted for the company in a precedent - setting court case concerning posted workers and
claims on salary
discrimination of foreign employees.
Tree v South East Coastal Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT / 0043/17 / LA: successful for employee appellant
regarding correct approach
of ET to making deposit orders in
discrimination claims.
In the civil courts currently instructed by the Equality and Human Rights Commission in a
claim of race
discrimination against the Open University
regarding its policy
of excluding Cuban students (since revoked) pursuant to US trade sanctions.
The court granted summary judgment on plaintiff's
claim of discriminatory advertising, but denied her motions
regarding refusal to rent due to family status and
discrimination in terms and conditions
of rental.
Regarding indirect
discrimination: (1) the plaintiff must show a prima facie case
of discrimination; (2) the defendant may rebut the
claim with proof
of legitimate, non-discriminatory business reasons for his actions; and (3) a plaintiff may show that the reasons were pretextual.