Not exact matches
The guidance paper, jointly published this month in ACOEM's Journal
of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (JOEM) and AAOHN's journal Workplace Health & Safety, summarizes current evidence
regarding marijuana consumption; discusses possible side
effects, including temporary impairment as it relates to the workplace; reviews existing federal and state laws that impact employers; and suggests various strategies available for monitoring
marijuana use among employees.
For example, the Arizona State Bar published an opinion about the
effect of Rule 1.2 (d) on a lawyer's ability to advise clients
regarding activity that is permissible Arizona's Medical
Marijuana Act, «despite the fact that such conduct potentially may violate applicable federal law».
The Court's «empirical turn,» most recently exemplified by its decision in R. v. Smith, 2015 SCC 34, which relied on research
regarding the therapeutic
effects of various forms
of medical
marijuana, has not exactly followed a consistent trajectory.
A big challenge for the life insurance industry is that unlike alcohol and tobacco, there have not been enough studies done on the long - term
effects of marijuana usage to determine any definite conclusions in
regards to risk
of mortality.