Jesus was and his about truth and following the will of his Father thru his Holy Church which he commishioned to make these decisions
regarding faith and morals.
Not exact matches
Each denomination was fully independent but agreed to surrender certain prerogatives with
regard to general problems such as defense of the
faith, spread of the gospel,
and moral reform.
For life within the Catholic Church, the stumbling - block as
regards change in the Church's doctrine is not so much the question of defined dogmas as other doctrines of the Church in dogmatic
and moral theology which are taught authoritatively but which in principle can not count as defined doctrines of
faith or as irreformable dogma.
And there is no reason for us to take a superior position regarding our ancestors in the faith, as if we ourselves did not suffer from limitations of perspective and from a keen ability to disguise our self - interest in moral respectabili
And there is no reason for us to take a superior position
regarding our ancestors in the
faith, as if we ourselves did not suffer from limitations of perspective
and from a keen ability to disguise our self - interest in moral respectabili
and from a keen ability to disguise our self - interest in
moral respectability.
The Protestant will
regard specific norms, in the
moral sphere, even in the form in which they appear in scripture, rather as a sort of sign - post pointing out the way to meet
and endure the ever new situations of the personal life of
faith, with a critical attitude towards oneself
and one's hidden sinfulness.
I also firmly accept
and hold each
and every thing (omnia et singula) that is proposed by that same church definitively (definitive) with
regard to teaching concerning
faith and morals.
It met in the Vatican in 1869 - 1870,
and its most notable decrees, later promulgated by the Pope, declared «that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when in discharge of the office of pastor
and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine of
faith and morals to be held by the universal Church, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that His Church should be possessed for defining doctrine
regarding faith or
morals;
and that therefore such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are irreformable of themselves,
and not from the consent of the Church»;
and that the Roman Pontiff has «full
and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which belong to
faith and morals, but also in those which relate to the discipline
and government of the Church spread throughout the world.»
I firmly embrace
and retain each
and every thing which has been proposed by the church
regarding the teaching of
faith and morals, whether defined by solemn judgment or asserted
and declared by the ordinary magisterium, especially those things which concern the mystery of the holy church of Christ
and its sacraments
and the sacrifice of the Mass
and the primacy of the Roman pontiff.
These include obsessive focus on food choice, planning, purchase, preparation,
and consumption; food
regarded primarily as source of health rather than pleasure; distress or disgust when in proximity to prohibited foods; exaggerated
faith that inclusion or elimination of particular kinds of food can prevent or cure disease or affect daily well - being; periodic shifts in dietary beliefs while other processes persist unchanged;
moral judgment of others based on dietary choices; body image distortion around sense of physical «impurity» rather than weight; persistent belief that dietary practices are health - promoting despite evidence of malnutrition.