Sentences with phrase «regarding global increasing»

Based on updated studies, AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in drought since the 1970s were probably overstated.

# New results indicate that AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in droughts since 1970s are no longer supported

• «Based on updated studies, AR4 [the 2007 IPCC report] conclusions regarding global increasing trends in drought since the 1970s were probably overstated.»

Not exact matches

Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.

It is generally expected that the UK's exit from the EU will take place within two years after the UK formally notifies the European Council of its intent to withdraw, but there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the potential consequences and timeframe for such exit, which may increase global market volatility.

The risk assessment stems from the objective stated in the 2015 Paris Agreement regarding climate change that society keep average global temperatures «well below» a 2 °C (3.6 °F) increase from what they were before the Industrial Revolution.

Regarding your second comment, in point of fact temperature increase is linear with logarithmically increasing CO2: climate sensitivity, you may recall, measures global mean surface temperature increase per doubling of atmospheric concentration of CO2.

Thus, increasing awareness regarding the health benefits of omega - 3 fatty acids, which has in turn resulted in increasing direct human consumption (DHC) of fish oils, is driving the global fish oil market.

This panel examined key policy takeaways from the 2015 PISA results, reviewed strategies to increase the global competitiveness of American students, and previewed opportunities and challenges in regard to the implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act and the incoming Trump administration.

With the entire world watching the recent Fukushima events and the rising of radiation levels, reported mutations and increasing numbers of cancer patients (Kudo himself died of cancer) his oeuvre can be regarded as a valid political statement of contemporary culture on a global scale.

However, I am curious whether you will do the same with respect to the diminished nutritional value of these crops, the increased global prevailence and severity of droughts, diminished agricultural output in Indonesia, etc, or, as is suggested by your response, do you intend to «accentuate the positive» with regard to climate change by omitting the costs?

Regarding changes in rainforest area, keep in mind Isaac's point that local precipitation can go up a lot while global precipitation is increasing just a bit.

Whereas any efforts to mitigate the risks of, prepare for, or otherwise address our changing climate and its effects should not constrain the United States economy, especially in regards to global competitiveness; and Whereas there is increasing recognition that we can and must take meaningful and responsible action now to address this issue: Now, therefore, be it

Even though some of the CMIP models produce a lot of global warming, all of them are still stable in this regard, with net increases in lost radiation with warming (NOTE: If analyzing the transient CMIP runs where CO2 is increased over long periods of time, one must first remove that radiative forcing in order to see the increase in radiative loss).

Given the increased levels of certainty regarding human - induced global warming (from 90 to 95 %), more robust projections on sea - level rise and data on melting of ice sheets, and the «carbon budget» for staying below the 2 °C target, the WGI conclusions together with other AR5 component reports are likely to put more pressure on the UNFCCC parties to deliver by 2015 an ambitious agreement that is capable of preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.

In its first assessment report, the IPCC provided no new data regarding the cause of the temperature increase in the late 1970s or the relationship between increasing CO2 and global warming.

IPCC claims to know this (as expressed in its attribution statement regarding «most of the observed increase in global average temperature since the mid-20th century...»), but as our hostess and others have pointed out, there is much too much uncertainty regarding natural factors to make such an assessment with any degree of certainty.

However, despite this, the team reckon to have perhaps isolated a «global warming» signal in the accelerated run off of the Greenland Ice Mass — but only just, because the runoff at the edges is balanced by increasing central mass — again, they focus upon recent trends — a net loss of about 22 cubic kilometres in total ice mass per year which they regard as statistically not significant — to find the «signal», and a contradiction to their ealier context of air temperature cycles.

Continuing with enthusiasm throughout his career, Bob moved into a new forum in retirement in which his goal was to restore integrity to science in general, where imposters had torn down its very fabric through promotion of the popular fallacy regarding the influence of carbon dioxide in causing increased Global Warming.

That is an argument I would probably tend to agree with, though many on the AGW side of this debate have denigrated the notion that the Sun's variations aren't really responsible for the recent increase in global surface T, so I'm not sure your argument is fruitful in that regard.

By attacking the level of certainty that people may hold with regard to either the existence of or human causation of global warming, climate change denial has attractions for those outside the inner circle of beneficiaries from the fossil fuel industry who do not want to reckon with either changes in their own lifestyle or with the increased role of government required by effective climate action.

For example, evidence regarding limits to adaptation does not substantiate or refute the idea that an increase in global mean temperature beyond 2 °C represents an adaptation limit or, subsequently «dangerous anthropogenic interference» as defined by the UNFCCC's Article II.

In any regard the lack of global coverage of the sat record might account for some of the reason that the last 3 years shows no increase.

Regarding your second comment, in point of fact temperature increase is linear with logarithmically increasing CO2: climate sensitivity, you may recall, measures global mean surface temperature increase per doubling of atmospheric concentration of CO2.

Regarding the energy line, is it solely from projected increases in energy consumption that are attributable to global warming, or does it also assume increases in real energy prices?

â $ œI believe that although there may be a number of factors with regard to oil, the predominant factor by far is supply and demand, is the fact that global production and capacity hasnâ $ ™ t increased appreciably over the last 10 years and the demand has continued to grow and inventories are at low levels, â $?

With regard to his «other hypotheses, predict the opposite» he may be referring to increased albedo due to the expectation that increased global warming increases snowfall in the northern and southern latitudes; or the shutdown of the thermohaline circulation of the ocean.

In regards to this winter's weather, short term record cold temperatures are an expected outcome of «global warming», which is really an increase in the amount of energy contained in the earth's ecosystem.

The two make a range of often - repeated claims by climate change skeptics, including that there have been «no increase in frequency or intensity of storms, floods or droughts,» that sea ice isn't melting considerably, and that there is supposedly no scientific consensus regarding global warming.

Regarding the sensitivity of the climate to the increased greenhouse effect, Dessler pointed out that the 2014 IPCC report matched the 2001, 1995, and 1990 reports, estimating an eventual global surface warming of 1.5 — 4.5 °C in response to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Case in point, a new peer - reviewed study has examined the factual evidence regarding the increased frequency and increased intensity of hail storms that CO2 - centric, global warming climate models predict; and the study has found the predictions to be without merit.

With regards to their statements that the global data can not be trusted since they don't agree with climate model results (which suggest a smaller increase in hurricane intensity).

There also appears to increasing Global Warming; however, there does not appear to be increasing SSTs in either the Atlantic or the Pacific according to the NOAA TOA or TOAST sites with regard to the ITCZ SSTs or the 20 Degree C isotherm depths.

Titled Climate agency accused of cooling on global warming as new report lowers predicted temperature increase, it presented a diversity of perspectives regarding climate change and the soon - to - be-released Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Regarding your analysis: I already indicated I have little faith in your ability to do the analysis (I earlier looked at temperature data you claimed showed no increase, and actually found a HUGE increase, much larger than the global mean).