If religions thus eschew separate «communal power» and seek justice in society, there is no reason why for this purpose, they should not bring their specific faith - insights
regarding public morality into dialogue and common action through secular multi-religious groups open for faith - interaction among themselves as well as with secular ideologies.
Not exact matches
The Nixon - Graham doctrine of the relation of religion to
public morality and policy, as revealed in the White House services, has two defects: (1) It
regards all religion as virtuous in guaranteeing
public justice.
Of course Law provides that any fundamental right can be exercised only with due
regard to
morality and
public order.
And these conclusions are (or should be) still relevant to contemporary debates
regarding the family, since they make the case that the
public, and therefore government, has a legitimate interest in stable families (up to a point, that is, the point at which children have been raised) and therefore in the sexual
morality that protects the marital bond.
Then, there are the many troubles of Senate President Saraki, all hinged on alleged lack of basic integrity in government and scant
regard for
public morality.