Sentences with phrase «regards to comments referring»

In regards to comments referring that agents provide stagers with business, I would like to stipulate that current home sellers are very savvy and I have been approached by home sellers directly prior to listing with any agent and before an agent is selected.

Not exact matches

Any comments regarding safe and secure investments, and guaranteed income streams refer only to fixed insurance products.

As for me regarding the human condition, I'd refer to my comments above about the christocentric view of human nature).

In my comments I referred to «The depravity of their cynicism...» regarding opponents raising spurious arguments in opposition to Golden Rice.

We as fans and rest of the world outside the closed doors of our club might not need to know but if the board don't know by now we are in deep shi7, i'm referring to Ivan Gazidis comment where his said they» the board» are waiting for an answer from AW for a while now regarding weather he will stay or leave WOW i bet every manager would like to be in that position» job for a life»

Well then, I refer you to Walter's previous comment in this regard, but as far as on merit is concerned it's bleedin» obvious isn't it?

Cuomo's office did not respond directly to Bloomberg's comments but referred POLITICO New York to remarks the governor made last month regarding Indian Point's proximity to one of the biggest population centers in the world.

The county's comments to DEC indicate that the problem existed before Hurricane Irene, but the EPA refers to last year's megastorm, stating, «These severe weather conditions, which may occur with more frequency, have caused EPA to reconsider its position regarding the use of the release channel.»

I think she is referring to what ashley mills was commenting on regarding ultrasounds for women to find out if they have a baby who has a handicap that the parents might want to have the option of abortion.

There was a comment on my Facebook Page regarding the low carb bagels we've been discussing, referring to «fake bagels» vs «store bought bagels».

Does anyone have anything comments in this regard or links they can refer me to.

As regards your comment on the «guardians of good taste»; to whose good taste are you referring?

Most of those other parking helper apps require you to specify your location before walking away from the vehicle (allow me to refer back to my comment regarding my terrible memory, as this would involve my needing to remember that I need to remember).

Any comments regarding safe and secure products and guaranteed income streams refer only to fixed insurance products.

@WellingtonTurntop - regarding your comment «In personal life we are allowed to save for lean times... it seems strange that businesses are not allowed to» - note that the personal savings you refer to would be with after - tax money.

I was referring the latter use of the term clicker training in regards to my horse comments.

Regarding Mark's comment (# 181) presumably referring to mine and James» (# 176 - 178) I was just being sloppy in my wording when I said «an increase in hurricanes».

I guess the question in this case (referring to comment # 33 regarding whether there really has been a trend and the reference to Michaels and hurricane loss) boils down to weighing the normalisation of hurricane loss (used to adjust the trends in total hurricane loss) against the calculations by Emanuel as well as the degree of representativeness in this case.

In regards to the «ridiculous» comment, I was referring to the fact that the odds of Congress agreeing to repeal and re-pass literally every law currently in the books probably hovers around zero; It would be very difficult to convince me that the following scenario wouldn't occur: a partisan law gets repealed in preparation for re-codification, only to be rejected by the opposing party when it comes time to re-pass it.

If reference is made to what Counsel for the KRG also described as the embodiment of customary international law, namely the 2004 Convention (see Lord Bingham's comments to which I have just referred), Article 7 is clear in providing that «a state can not invoke immunity from jurisdiction in a proceeding before a court of another state with regard to a matter or case if it has expressly consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court with regard to the matter or case» either «(a) by international agreement; (b) in a written contract; or (c) by a declaration before the court or by a written communication in a specific proceeding.»

Can you be more specific with regards to the comment that you're referring too?

Hi John: The lawyers to which I refer made these comments either in passing while discussing same or as outright responses to my questions regarding the legal validity of same.