WIth
regards to the point on visibility and accountability, it has been well - documented that people behave in different (often more pro-social and positive) ways when they know they are being observed: - Hawthorne Effect - Social Facilitation - Panopticon
Not exact matches
Your
point regarding to ensure return of every dollar you spend is spot
on.
Slowly but surely, tech vendors are recognizing that they not only have
to be
on point regarding product functionality and support, they must also make genuine human connections with customers — developing relationships that inspire more than a transactional bond between parties but instead build bonds based
on trust and real human experiences.
In this
regard, most applications of gamification are missing the
point; they focus
on peripheral or secondary mechanics instead of the ones that really work, motivating people
to use the product in a way that highlights the product's benefits and adds real value along the way.
Finally,
on the planning
point, even accepting that census data may be important for planning purposes, query
to what extent the data contained in the long - form census is helpful in that
regard.
The exemption requires disclosure of material conflicts of interest and basic information relating
to those conflicts and the advisory relationship (Sections II and III), contract disclosures, contracts and written policies and procedures (Section II), pre-transaction (or
point of sale) disclosures (Section III (a)-RRB-, web - based disclosures (Section III (b)-RRB-, documentation
regarding recommendations restricted
to proprietary products or products that generate third party payments (Section (IV), notice
to the Department of a Financial Institution's intent
to rely
on the PTE, and maintenance of records necessary
to prove that the conditions of the PTE have been met (Section V).
YouGov's data
points to a brand that is still well
regarded, but is struggling
to be unique and standout against rivals
on key metrics.
But as has been
pointed out many times
on RPE, the Nordics manage
to rank highly
on economic competitiveness rankings while have superior social outcomes, especially in
regards to poverty and inequality.
The business climate index fell thirteen
points to 7.7, signaling that firms,
on balance,
regarded the business climate as better than normal, though
to a lesser extent than last month.
15.15 % Of polled customers appear
to point LTC has a correct resolution
on this
regard.
That in and of itself isn't necessarily unusual, but combined with an ongoing war of words among House Republicans with
regards to Rosenstein, it
points to an effort
to delegitimize the deputy attorney general within the GOP and among Trump's supporters, an effort that Trump himself has engaged in
on Twitter.
They'll take
on your work and publish dozens of links
pointing back
to your client's domain, without
regard to quality.
Finally a mention Of IPAB by Romney - I thought Romney did very well
on Medicare, but he left a few
points on the field in
regard to Obama's centralized rationing board.
Typically, evangelicalism focuses
on Biblicism and salvation as two of its major foundations and
regards these as cutting across denominational boundaries,
pointing to a deeper unity.
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed
to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited
to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are
on about that men use
to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this
point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed
to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough
to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
From my stand
point of view, the Republicans should be focused
on try
to help and support this country
Regards Juan Apenado
With
regard to miracles, CS Lewis
pointed out that if,
on each of two nights, I put # 10 into my bedside drawer the laws of arithmetic tell me that I now have a total of # 20.
«If the Church does not
regard Israel from a Christian
point of view,» he remarked, «if it does not recognize the theological significance of this people, having a national destiny that can be cultivated only in Zion, the Church has no right
to pass judgment
on Israel.»
Didion's
point is that this tendency has flattened discussion since 9/11, and has created a government in which Democrats, with few exceptions, either have remained silent or have supported whatever the president wants with respect
to foreign policy — the congressional vote
on war powers in
regard to Iraq being the, prime example.
On a fourth
point I beg
to differ from Bishop Lilje: The Catholic is not compelled by his faith
to regard the Church and her magisterium as the first and fundamental factor of his Christian faith.
I'm sure I'm self - serving here or muddled
to the
point of oblivion, but your quote from Stage 6 in Stages of Faith, and your agonized Christ -
on - the - Cross questioning the inadequacy of the «love everybody» notion seems pertinent
to both my critique of you, David, and your critique of me in the last blog thread that went
on and
on regarding victimization.
Gregory makes a stunning
point on the ambiguities of giving
to those derelicts among the poor who are by consensus generally
regarded as less worthy: One should give not just
to the unworthy poor, but also
to the worthy poor, regardless of their moral condition, and for a profound reason: because one «gives of his bread
to an indigent sinner, not because he is a sinner, but because he is a man.
In 2000 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a document called Dominus Iesus and then, in 2007, reiterated its main
points in «Responses
to Some Questions
Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine
on the Church.»
That went
on for some time with only minor hiccups such as happens whenever humans gather until at some
point, unbeknownst
to me, we seemed
to have slipped into this
point where we were expected
to have an affinity for the denomination and thus automatically hold its leadership in high
regard and limit our criticism of such.
The EA had already written
to Oasis following a council meeting in September 2013, asking them
to include
on their website resources which put across the «traditional evangelical»
point of view
regarding homosexuality.
He asks why «no word of condemnation comes from any Arab regime
regarding the murder of innocent Iraqis
on a daily basis» and
points out that «so - called Muslim community leaders... have also failed
to condemn these killings of fellow Muslims, while finding every «contextual» excuse for global Islamic violence.»
The
point I am trying
to make is this:
on the basis of a prima facie examination of human experience, it would seem that there is a basic sense of wonder with
regard to there being anything at all.
did not
regard equality with God as something
to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave (doulos), being born in human likeness And being found in human form, he humbled himself and became obedient
to the
point of death even death
on a cross.
But Gloege
points out that there is evidence in the Jewish Targum, 21 which «shows that Jesus» resurrection «
on the third day» was
regarded as the fulfillment of Hosea's prophecy by Christians at a very early date; it erased the precise chronological reference «after two days» and «
on the third day» and replaced them by the more general phrases «in the days of consolation» and «
on the day of resurrection», in order
to exclude the Christian interpretation.»
For as
regards infra - human living things, even
on the suppositions already mentioned, the question is probably still open, or has not yet been sufficiently subjected
to examination, whether the living substantial formal principle of what in the metaphysical sense would be a real species (biological category, etc.), is multiplied with the individuals of the species (biological group, etc.), or is one and the same principle which, unfolding its formative power at various material
points in space and time, manifests itself more than once in space and time.
The Catholic World Report asked Cardinal Burke how important he thought it was that Pope Francis should «make a statement soon in order
to address the growing sense — among many in the media and in the pews — that the Church is
on the cusp of changing her teaching
on various essential
points regarding marriage, «remarriage», reception of Communion, and even the place of «unions» among homosexuals».
By the end of the Assembly, as Kenneth Slack
pointed out, «most of the members felt that there was more danger from undue stress
on the evangelism of individuals than the other way round, despite widely expressed anxiety, given expression by Stott, that liberation in political, social and economic sense was in danger of replacing salvation from sin at the heart of the redeeming gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing of the range of disagreements, important differences continued, especially with
regard to the meaning of salvation and the program of dialogue with people of other faiths.
The tendency
to regard a denomination as the ultimate environment in which the school carries
on its work or as at least the last society
to whose purposes reference must be made is
on the wane, as has been
pointed out, in most of the seminaries and Bible colleges in the United States and Canada.
lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing
to have argument against religion from a religious stand
point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it
to the human race as well as everything else
on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back
to your
point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the
point, every religious person i have ever met has and
on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without
regard for there souls — it seems
to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition
to and plus every else believes so its always
to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature
to be part of the group.
[4] Humanae Vitae makes the
point quite clearly: «a conjugal act imposed
on one's partner without
regard to his or her condition or personal and reasonable wishes in the matter, is no true act of love, and therefore offends the moral order in its particular application
to the intimate relationship of husband and wife» (no. 13).
Phrygian
to me i sense that you are struggling with issues in your mind that you cant reconcile and these issues are affecting what you believe in your heart and therefore your faith in God.I had something similar happen
to me recently
regarding the story of the demon possessed man at one
point the demons begged Jesus
to cast them into the pigs does that mean that Jesus was implicated with the work of satan.It cast my mind into doubt and then i began
to question who God is.I prayed and sort the holy spirit for an answer the answer i got was that Gods character never changes he is always holy righteous and sovereign why else would satan ask for his permission.So the answer was that he allowed satans purpose
to prevail so that we can see that satans intention is always
to destroy it may well have been that the pigs were his anyway.As they were for the gentile nations who offered the pigs
to their demon Gods.Just as satan can not change who he is the destroyer the thief the liar God can not change who he is when we realise that despite what we see going
on in the world God is still the same yesterday today and forever.The time is coming when those that have hurt others will be judged for there wickedness as we serve a holy and just God.Just as it was in the times of Noah so it is with this this generation that as the wickedness reachs its zenith then the Lord will return
to judge the nations.He is coming again and we need
to be ready it is not a time
to be caught sleeping.brentnz
Newton does not believe that gravity is an essential property of matter, but he also denies that it can be a force that acts at a distance.15 Newton is clear
on one
point with
regard to his analysis of gravitation; he is concerned with the mathematical treatment of gravitation, not with the nature or causes of gravitation or the manner in which gravitation acts but with the conditions under which gravitation acts (PNP 5f, 192).
Even many of today's Christians, who in other respects may be
regarded as being very liberal in their outlook, have been inclined
to rest their faith
on the historical reliability of the resurrection narratives, as
pointing to at least one incontestable miracle of a supernatural character, and they have been alarmed when the «Empty Tomb» stories came
to be
regarded as legendary.
David Robertson is keen
to continue the dialogue between himself and Steve Chalke,
pointing out the things they agree
on before clarifying his position with
regards to Steve's latest blog post asserting that the Bible isn't infallible
A qualification would, however, be added at this
point: the concrescent process of feeling is not for Whitehead
to be
regarded as that kind of metaphysical «ground»
on which can be established an account of the nature of things that has unrestricted universality.
Vandana Shiva makes, this
point in more detail with
regard to the social systems of developing countries — the Green Revolution, she writes, has in fact impoverished most of the people it sought
to help, and the Gene Revolution now following
on its heels will only increase the damage.
These statements include those made
on 23 February, partly retracted by Baroness Morgan with
regard to abortion, but also immediately after her retraction when she says that Catholic schools «will be required
to teach that contraception exists, is available, and
to say that the Church's
point of view isnot the only one» (our emphasis).
Neither side conceded or was able
to agree
on any
point made by the other
regarding genetically modified food.
The
point of this web site is quite specific —
to discuss environmental and ecological sustainability in the coffee industry and highlight companies that have strong records in this
regard which provide the background and information so like - minded consumers can make a choice based
on those preferences.
Arsenal capital will maintain their leadership position as the best managed sports investment vehicle as they are
on track
to lead the world with
regards to net spend per
point earned.
The Germany international hit a sublime volley in the first half
to secure all three
points in a tight game, showing the kind of class
on the pitch that's made him
regarded as one of the finest in Europe down the years.
And Doc's response adds nuance
to your proposition that provides differing perspective
on the same perceived issue (especially Cal's «unenviable position» and the
point regarding fan treatment of Diallo and Richards).
nice
to see you crawl out of your hole just in time
to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived
on the scene and will continue
to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought
to the EPL, which at that
point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff
to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product
on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid
to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry
to RVP
to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy
to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims
regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose
to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending
to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was
to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done
to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary
to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues
to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team
to pretend
to follow
This is an incredibly difficult question
to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only
to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel
to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards
to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago...
on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender
on staf, Mustafi, who seems
to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early
to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency
to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive
on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs
to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious
to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities
on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently
to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow
to ever boss the midfield and he tends
to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some
points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed
to play Francis in a more advanced role
on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready
to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him
to use Francis and then he had the nerve
to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary
to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed
to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third...
on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends
to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little
to no sense considering what he has
to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford
to focus too heavily
on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try
to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in
regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are
on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair
to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went
to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had
to choose one of those 3 players
to stay
on it would be Ox due
to his potential as a plausible alternative
to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue
to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen
on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due
to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem
to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold
to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction
to heroin without the benefits
Discussions
regarding OG are always quite heated
on here, but I'd like
to point out that he did indeed score 14 goals in 27 appearances: however, only 21 of those matches were starts.