One of the first priorities must be to establish
regional representative bodies which can link to local, as well as state and national levels - Regional Partnership Agreements can provide a solid basis for this to occur.
This could be achieved through the introduction of new provisions to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 to support the role of
regional representative bodies on the mainland.
The adequacy of the legal status of
regional representative bodies should be considered as part of monitoring processes for RPAs within the next two years (that is, during the life of the Ngaanyatjarra Agreement).
The first priority must be the establishment of
regional representative bodies which can link to the local level as well up to the state and national levels.
Torres Strait Islander people living on the mainland have been invited to, and participated in, meetings on the new arrangements in Indigenous affairs, particularly community consultations on new
regional representative bodies, and will be able to continue their involvement in planning through the new representative mechanisms.
formal mechanisms, where the national body draws its members from national, state / territory or
regional representative bodies, holds regular state - wide policy forums or develops other regional - level mechanisms based on boundaries used by the previous ATSIC Regional Councils or based on Indigenous geographic regions
Formal mechanisms — where the national body draws its members from national, state / territory or
regional representative bodies, holds regular state - wide policy forums or develops other regional - level mechanisms
At present there are a number of
regional representative bodies that are in existence.
Understanding the factors that have been in play in past Indigenous representative bodies, in State / Territory and
regional representative bodies and in Indigenous representative bodies overseas highlights what are some of the key issues that should be taken into account when considering possible forms for such a body.
The parameters are themselves of some concern, as they indicate that the shift away from
regional representative bodies is definite.
As well as being responsible for formulating, administering and monitoring the effectiveness of programs to individuals, councils and community organisations in key development areas (such as economic, employment and training, housing and environmental, social and cultural, policy co-ordination), the TSRA is
the regional representative body for native title and land and sea management.
Not exact matches
The remaining 40 to 45 per cent of
representatives for each
body (the «additional members») are elected in large
regional areas using a proportional representation system, so as to match every party's share of winning candidates to their votes share.
It consists of the chairs of
regional parties,
representatives elected by
regional party members, a
representative of youth and members other interest
bodies that operate within the English party.
It had recommended the replacement of the ATSIC Board of Commissioners with a national
body comprised of
regional representatives and a smaller national executive drawn from this
body.
Any National Indigenous
Representative Body will need to be alert to how it can effectively work with the regional and State / Territory representative bodies, and the current administration arrangements in place for Indig
Representative Body will need to be alert to how it can effectively work with the
regional and State / Territory
representative bodies, and the current administration arrangements in place for Indig
representative bodies, and the current administration arrangements in place for Indigenous affairs.
Mechanisms for representing Indigenous peoples at the
regional level Mechanisms for representing Indigenous peoples at the state or territory level The National structure of the National Indigenous
Representative Body
Some options for the National Indigenous
Representative Body to engage at the
regional and State / Territory level include:
It demonstrates that, particularly at the
regional level, all Indigenous groups can not be homogenised into a single
representative body, but require distinct
representative arrangements.
These lessons learned from previous mechanisms for national Indigenous representation can help identify what issues need to be discussed when considering the scope of a new National Indigenous
Representative Body, particularly in relation to the roles and functions of the body, its level of independence and its relationships with government at the national, State / Territory and regional lev
Body, particularly in relation to the roles and functions of the
body, its level of independence and its relationships with government at the national, State / Territory and regional lev
body, its level of independence and its relationships with government at the national, State / Territory and
regional levels.
Participants agreed that
regional representatives should be selected from the local level through a democratic process, selecting local leaders onto
regional councils either through election or from peak
bodies such as the Aboriginal Medical Services.
[211] In June 2005, the then Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs had confirmed that the government remained committed to establishing
representative bodies at the
regional level:
A National Indigenous
Representative Body could provide specialist mediation and facilitation assistance to Indigenous communities in developing community planning processes to be fed into a broader
regional and State / Territory - wide planning process.
Importantly, the new National Indigenous
Representative Body will have to consider how to interface with this regional body in terms of ensuring Torres Strait Islander participation at the national le
Body will have to consider how to interface with this
regional body in terms of ensuring Torres Strait Islander participation at the national le
body in terms of ensuring Torres Strait Islander participation at the national level.
In announcing the abolition of ATSIC, the government stated its intention to support the creation of a network of
regional representative Indigenous
bodies to interact with governments.
This Chamber would provide a regular forum for national peak
bodies and state / territory or
regional level
representative bodies to interact.
In June 2005, the then Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs confirmed that the government remained committed to establishing
representative bodies at the
regional level:
Some of the ways in which a new National Indigenous
Representative Body could engage with Indigenous people, communities and organisations at the
regional and state / territory level, include:
After wide national consultation the final Report, titled In the hands of the regions, recommended urgent structural reform enabling greater
regional control and a permanent division of ATSIC's administrative and elected
representative roles (to be achieved through a single
body - i.e. by reunifying ATSIS and ATSIC).
The new arrangements are built on a process of negotiating
regional priorities with Indigenous
representative bodies as well as negotiating shared responsibility agreements with local communities or groups.
A consistent and «connected» structure, so that there is a clear relationship between the national
body and Indigenous peak
bodies, service delivery organisations and other
representative mechanisms that may exist at the State, Territory or
regional level.
A third, informal and more minimalist option would be for a National Indigenous
Representative Body to convene
regional forums and planning processes on a regular or cyclical basis.
It will be important for the new National Indigenous
Representative Body to ensure that clear and consistent mechanisms are in place with the relevant
bodies (i.e. COAG, Ministerial Taskforce on Indigenous Affairs, Secretaries Group on Indigenous Affairs, the Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination and
regional Indigenous Coordination Centres).
There was also support for the
body to have a tiered structure (with community,
regional, state, national level engagement), and also support for a streamlined national structure,
regional bodies and for the national
representative body to have membership on COAG and Ministerial Councils.
formal mechanisms whereby a National Indigenous
Representative Body has components that exist at different levels (such as in each State and Territory and at the
regional level);
Indicating that it will support the creation of a network of
regional representative Indigenous
bodies by 1 July 2005 to interact with the Government and utilising existing ATSIC
Regional Council structures until then;
In this model, organisations, national Indigenous peak
bodies,
regional and / or state / territory level
representative organisations could nominate a delegate / s to represent them in the National Indigenous Repres
representative organisations could nominate a delegate / s to represent them in the National Indigenous
RepresentativeRepresentative Body.
Should the National Indigenous
Representative Body just involve a national level structure; or should it also include State and Territory and / or
regional structures?
What other mechanisms should the
representative body use to engage at a
regional and local level?
O'Donoghue's minority report in the Hiatt inquiry aimed to deal with this issue by proposing that the replacement for the NACC should be based in
regional organisations feeding into state advisory
bodies that comprised both
regional Indigenous
representatives and state public officials.
Representatives from each State / Territory should then constitute the national
body, achieving a direct relationship between the
regional, state and national levels;
The Victorian Aboriginal Affairs Minister announces a series of consultation sessions have been planned for
regional Victoria with a view to establishing a new
representative body for the State's Indigenous communities.
Should the National Indigenous
Representative Body be a national - level structure or include state / territory and / or
regional structures?
The range of national, State / Territory, and
regional level outlined above demonstrate that a diversity of Indigenous
representative bodies is currently in existence in Australia.
This will be important for ensuring consistency between program delivery by these
bodies and the work of the new National Indigenous
Representative Body, particularly in terms of linking national policy development with
regional level program implementation.
Secondly, the Issues Paper looked at a range of national, state / territory and
regional Indigenous
representative bodies currently operating in Australia including:
State - based mechanisms being a feature of a new National Indigenous
Representative Body, potentially drawing their representatives from regional representati
Representative Body, potentially drawing their
representatives from
regional representativerepresentative mechanisms;
How such an approach would impact on the level of direct engagement with Indigenous peoples at the
regional level would depend on what other processes for participation existed within the National Indigenous
Representative Body.
Negotiating agreements at the
regional level with the
representative Indigenous
body and at the local level with Indigenous communities.
As noted above, Indigenous peoples could be represented at a
regional level by a National Indigenous
Representative Body through the existence of formal structures at the
regional level, or through more informal processes.
Some participants prefer that the national
body deal directly with regions and that a
regional elected member (s) be the interface between local communities, and the national
representative body.