Sentences with phrase «regress under»

What needs to be asked is that why do players regress under Wenger these days especially young and promising players.

In the cold light of day we have to be brutally honest, no where else in world football would such shambolic management of top players be allowed to go on to such a degree where the players are clueless, not organised, seem to regress under wenger, no fire in their belly and are literally playing the worst football of any team i have seen at Highbury and the Emirtaes.

Yes I realise that sounds crazy, but any new signing will only regress under Wenger, and I'd prefer to keep the money for the next manager.

I also think a lot of Arsenal's Young players, more than most, regress under the non tutelage from Mr. Wenger.

I think it has to do with Wenger, because even our experienced players seem to regress under Wenger, so what chance do the youngsters stand?

Players only regress under Wenger these days.

Arsenal are regressing under Wenger.»

«They are actually regressing under Jurgen Klopp.

The program progressed under Brown, while it regressed under Crum.

Yet another that is regressing under Wenger.

And while Maddux was already an elite starter when he arrived in 1993, he hardly regressed under Mazzone, winning 194 games and three Cy Youngs as a Brave, never experiencing serious arm trouble.

there are players in this team who certainly would get in to the wolves first 11... which is a shocking indictment of how far we have regressed under wenger

The Magic have actually regressed under Vogel, dropping from 35 wins in Skiles» only season to 29 last year and 23 this season with five games to go.

Given that EVERY player is now regressing under Wenger, it's likely Mkhitaryan will flop.

The club / team as regressed under the Wenger reign everyone can see that and that will include regression of individuals like Bellerin.

ElNeny was signed when Wenger wanted Xhaka, now Xhaka has been a flop and regressed under Wenger but ElNeny was a board signing.

Indeed, as we both think, they have regressed under Wenger.

It's a FACT, that Arsenal have been regressing under Wenger, so that has to be addressed.

I would argue, given the results whilst acknowledging that our squad has got stronger over the last three years, that Arsenal are actually regressing under Wenger, not progressing.

It will be unfair on Pochettino to say the Saints have regressed under him.

Not exact matches

And we'll never permit our society to regress to a medieval state under tribal law, especially someone else's.

Then when we are all equal under the law, we can move forward and make real progress instead of keeping things the way they are or regressing into the past mistakes of history.

Research indicates that when opinions, attitudes, or behavior do shift under the impact of communications, they tend to regress to the preexisting position unless they are reinforced by events, other communications, or group pressures.

However, the natural progression of his career in west London has seen him regress and fall into a cover role, particularly under Antonio Conte this season after the Italian switched to his favoured 3 -4-3 system.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

You run under the assumption that Shurmur leaving means their offense regresses.

In fact, come to think about it Chambers also impressed me when he first came on the scene but it seems all these players regress instead of progress under Wenger's coaching (or lack there of).

cus so far, our younger players seems to be regressing and I bet it's cus they get too comfortable under Wenger.

Walcott, welbeck and iwobi should be playing in southampton together or even in a lower team, such poor players that have even regressed more under wenger.

We will qualify tonight, CSKA are not a match We seem to be improving also, but Wenger is not disciplined enough to keep them performing consistently, we'll always regress at certain points in the future — that has been constant under Wenger We hit good form the season Leicester won it, few points to win and the Manager couldn't be steel enough to not allow slip - ups.

And say what you will, but Bryant didn't improve under Dooley, and it seems T - Will actually regressed.

Wenger wouldn't be a tough act to follow, because Arsenal consistently under perform, and the club is regressing at an alarming rate.

This season their win total has been set at just 76.5, yet public bettors think they'll regress even further by taking the under.

There were four boys three and under (3, 2 year old twins, and a four month old), the four - month - old was severe failure to thrive, the twins had developmental delays, and the 3 - year - old had major behavior problems (he had regressed after the baby was born, she had fought not to give in, and he had developed major behavior issues far beyond the typical 3 - year - old issues).

Another thing that ticks me off is the amount of prep time is not considered that the teacher had to do, and the money for the popsiclemsticks, snd tubs, and well, PBL needs lots of... TIME... somall teacher and unions will need to add 2 hours of in class teacher time fot the teachers to cover PBL and all common core standards... Why is it teachers do not speak out more about the pressure they must be under, all the while, knowing, that they are not effective teachers and learning is regressing...... How about some teachers, jus simple teachers, not spokespersons for them, just middle of the road teachers start posting on edsource the trials you went through in year 2014 - 2015....