Sentences with phrase &laquo;regressed since&raquo;

But hey, Chambers (who has been good so far) is almost a first team player... How far behind are we or how much we have regressed since 2006...!!

Despite spending big, and bringing in WC players, Arsenal have barely improved, and have actually regressed since the 14/15 season.

I believe he's regressed since his first season

Ox: Has regressed since joining Arsenal, average player at best Walcott: Supposed to be the next big thing, overpaid flop Chambers: Has gotten worse since joining Gibbs: Squad player, not lived up to potential Wilshere: Not lived up to potential Coquelin: One good season thus far Jenkinson: Not lived up to potential Sanogo:... Ramsey: Good, not spectacular player Bellerin: Only youngster that has excelled in any form recently

Patty Mills also proved himself in that Game 5 of the 2014 NBA Finals, but I do understand that Patty has regressed since.

Despite van Gaal's pedigree — he is one of the most decorated managers in the world game — he is enduring a miserable stint at Old Trafford, where things have regressed since he took United back to the Champions League last season.

http://www.caughtoffside.com/

When his advanced age is taken into account, Ridley's 1,045 - yard freshman season isn't impressive and he's regressed since then.

https://www.sportsinsights.com/

he has regressed since last season.enough said he shouldn't be in the first team.

One way is to say that if you introduce the consciousness of the observer as one of the variables of the world you are still in a regress since it implies that there is an awareness of the consciousness by a further observer who sees his state of consciousness, and so on.

On the contrary, the order a then b is unambiguous if a is necessary condition for b, while b is not so for a. Asymmetrical conditioning suffices for order of succession: moreover Kant seems part of the time to know this, for in dealing with the first antinomy, he argues that the future infinity of time is not a vicious regress since the infinity is only potential not actual.

As a League team we've been regressing since then, and there's no evidence to suggest that this trend will be reversed.

-- Gibbs can't get a sniff over Monreal — Ramsey has made our midfield regress since Santi's injury — Walcott is stealing a living — OX is a kick and run player — Wilshere is missing more than present (a little harsh)-- Welbeck would have never been signed if Wenger never took off that deadline day (sorry Danny but true)-- Where's Jenkinson injury aside?

But... the infinite regress in question is an example of the «non-vicious» type of regress, since it concerns possibilities, and these not (on one view of potentiality) as a definite multitude, whose number is infinite, but as a continuum, which in the words of Peirce is «beyond all multitude,» as God was formerly described as being; and indeed, as we shall see, the continuum of possibilities is one aspect of God which may be truly so described.

Unlike Samuel Beckett or Jorge Luis Borges, who provide a modernist critique of dialectical hubris by parodying the infinite regress of its logic while never going beyond that logic themselves, Solzhenitsyn claims to have learned how to move beyond the absurdities born of an unbridled rationalism, since he, and the rest of his fellow zeks (prisoners), have suffered dialectic's most extreme miscalculation.

While operating as one of the most profitable clubs in world football since the move to the Emirates Stadium, each year, the club has regressed further and further on the pitch.

http://www.caughtoffside.com/

Either Patty Mills has regressed or no improvement at all since his 2014 championship days.

His stats are pretty good for the position though Darmstadt has seen their points per game decrease since he started getting regular minutes and after building reputation and success on defensive strengths, they have been regressed badly.

We are just miles and miles away... They are on another planet... And when you consider that we are miles away from Chelsea, you realised that since 2006 we have been regressing on a constant basis...

Walcott hasn't really improved since he's been at Arsenal — if anything he might have regressed.

You say your a fan since the 70s then we've both seen other managers at the club players come and go and so do managers don't get caught up in nostalgia this is about Arsenal not Arsene and if you watch the team like you claim then you'd see we're miles off the top teams and miles off winning the premier league, we have regressed and if you think by winning the fa cup is progressing your easily pleased!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We have not successfully developed any youth player since Fabregas and RVP, we have spent a lot of money on good players such as Sanchez, Carzola and Ozil, but we are 6th, 33 points behind Mancity, out of the Fa, humiliated at the Carabao final, would be lucky to win the Europa, all our players (both homegrown and bought) are regressing and to sum it all up, we are playing shit.

Because they've steadily regressed in the 3 seasons since the last one: first round exit, first round sweep, no playoffs.

It's been almost 3 years now, since we have statred regressing, and that's is not just with winning trophies, but even our game quality has become dab and predictive.

This success clearly went to his arrogant, way past it head and he has failed every time since, when trying to convert players and only succeeded in playing then out of their natural comfort zone and true position, thus demoralising and regressing them as players.