Not exact matches
Nicol
regularly acts in publicly funded
cases for tenants and also sits as a part - time First - tier Tribunal judge.
We
regularly advise corporations and statutory bodies on regulatory breaches and private prosecution
cases and have
acted in partnership disputes between local and international firms.
Our attorneys are
regularly involved
in various types of cargo defense, cargo subrogation, maritime - related personal injury litigation, including Jones
Act and Long Shore Harbor Workers» Compensation
Act cases, marine casualties, such as collisions and oil spills as well as charter party disputes and insurance coverage.
He has
acted for the liquidator
in Edennote v Terry Venables; successfully resisted the winding - up of Stock, Aiken & Waterman; acted for the preference shareholders in the Barings dispute; advises on claims involving the transaction avoidance provisions of the Insolvency Act; appeared in Edward Klempka: In Re Parkside — important authority on the question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships; acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rule
in Edennote v Terry Venables; successfully resisted the winding - up of Stock, Aiken & Waterman;
acted for the preference shareholders
in the Barings dispute; advises on claims involving the transaction avoidance provisions of the Insolvency Act; appeared in Edward Klempka: In Re Parkside — important authority on the question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships; acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rule
in the Barings dispute; advises on claims involving the transaction avoidance provisions of the Insolvency
Act; appeared
in Edward Klempka: In Re Parkside — important authority on the question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships; acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rule
in Edward Klempka:
In Re Parkside — important authority on the question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships; acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rule
In Re Parkside — important authority on the question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships;
acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver
in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rule
in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud
case which involved the first
case of a SPC Receiver being recognised under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement;
regularly advises on recovery of assets
in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rule
in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rules.
He
regularly appears
in public law care
cases on behalf of parents, local authorities and guardians,
in private law proceedings (including domestic violence injunctions) and
in financial disputes (ancillary relief proceedings, trusts of land applications, Inheritance
Act applications and Schedule 1 Children
Act proceedings etc).
We have an expertise and
regularly appear
in cases involving rights and liabilities under the Landlord and Tenant
Act 1985, and we are as at home rolling our sleeves up to deal with complex factual disputes
in the FTT as we are
in higher Courts and Tribunals.
Regularly represents clients
in a variety of
cases that involve issues arising under the Federal Arbitration
Act and state analogs, including briefing and arguing numerous motions to both compel and stay arbitration.
He
regularly acts in substantial and complex
cases, whether alone or as part of a larger counsel team, where he often appears unled to handle interim applications.
She has expertise
in acting for both Applicants and Respondents
in cases concerning the Hague Convention, and
regularly represents parties
in applications made under the Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court / Wardship and child abduction
cases involving Non Hague Convention countries.
Nathan
regularly advises on and
acts in company law matters, often where these arise as one element of a broader
case.
Anne is also
regularly instructed
in complex care
cases, where she has
acted as a Junior alone and also where she has been led.
Daisy
acts for claimants and public bodies
in judicial review
cases and statutory appeals, and
regularly advises on public law issues.
As well as
acting on some of the most high - profile and precedent - setting
cases in recent years, our contentious procurement lawyers also
regularly succeed
in achieving our clients» aims without resorting to court proceedings.
Senior associate Katie McCraith «displays real attention to detail and sensitivity
in the way she handles
cases»; she
regularly acts in orthopaedic, gynaecological and cardiac claims, as well as
cases involving gall bladder injuries.
Tim has
acted in several high profile and leading procurement
cases in recent years, and
regularly advises both contracting authorities and economic operators
in relation to challenges following breaches of the Public Contract Regulations.
We
regularly act in all levels of court
in cases under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and
cases involving federalism issues.
Clifford Darton
regularly acts in environmental
cases in both the civil and criminal courts.
She
regularly acts for both children and parents
in complex care
cases where children have suffered non accidental injuries, serious physical or sexual abuse, and those with international issues requiring transfer of proceedings between jurisdictions.
Most recently, we have
acted in cases involving Chilean and Cuban law, and we deal
regularly with American legal matters.
Holly
regularly advises and
acts in cases concerning the range of community care issues, including needs assessment and provision, capacity issues and Court of Protection applications, deprivation of liberty, deputy appointments, etc..
In particular Marlene regularly acts in Public Interest Disclosure / Whistleblowing and complex sex, maternity, race and disability discrimination case
In particular Marlene
regularly acts in Public Interest Disclosure / Whistleblowing and complex sex, maternity, race and disability discrimination case
in Public Interest Disclosure / Whistleblowing and complex sex, maternity, race and disability discrimination
cases.
Weerawong, Chinnavat & Partners
regularly acts for leading Thailand and international corporations
in dispute and litigation
cases.
She
regularly appears
in the Court of Appeal and has
acted for the Guardian
in two
cases in the Supreme Court
As experts
in their fields the barristers have
acted as counsel
in notable
cases, including R (Oczelik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 260 and McIntosh v McIntosh [2014] EWCA Civ 557, and
regularly write publications on their areas of interest.
Also, Sophie
regularly deals with catastrophic PL
cases and has an expertise
in Animals
Act claims.