California upped the ante in 2005 by adding carbon dioxide to its list of
regulated tailpipe emissions.
Yesterday, the EPA held a hearing to debate whether California and 13 other states should be allowed to
regulate tailpipe emissions.
But legally defining it as a pollutant allows the EPA to e.g. use existing laws to
regulate tailpipe emissions.
«But legally defining it [CO2] as a pollutant allows the EPA to e.g. use existing laws to
regulate tailpipe emissions.»
California's efforts to regulate auto emissions date back to 1966 when it became the first in the nation to
regulate tailpipe emissions.
The latest attempt by the federal government to pre-empt California from enforcing its own laws to combat global warming was seen as another slap at the Schwarzenegger administration, which is dueling with the Bush administration over the state's authority to
regulate tailpipe emissions.
Not exact matches
It's a tactic that dates back to the 1970s when the Clean Air Act authorized the EPA to
regulate vehicle
tailpipe emissions.
He was joined by three other senators in June 2008 calling for EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson's resignation, after it became apparent that Johnson had succumbed to White House pressure to deny California the waiver needed for the state to
regulate carbon dioxide in
tailpipe emissions.
The states argued that they can
regulate carbon
emissions as a
tailpipe pollutant under the Clean Air Act.
Addressing another alternative —
regulating only
tailpipe GHG
emissions in California — Defendants speculate that it «may result in greater
emissions overall,» though CARB stated that GHG
emissions could be reduced by «increasing vehicle efficiency» or «reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled.»