Vermont asserted that
regulatory language requires that «the school's professional learning system shall be aligned with its staff evaluation and supervision policies, Continuous Improvement Plan, supervisory union and district goals, and shall provide new staff members with appropriate opportunities for professional learning.»
Not exact matches
[ii] Agencies post a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register, providing background on the issue, the
language of the proposed rule, and a
required regulatory impact analysis.
Senate HELP Chairman Lamar Alexander has been very vocal on SNS
language citing that «the current provision
language will
require states to show how much they spend per student, which goes beyond the scope of the Dept. of Ed's
regulatory authority.»
States may (but are not
required) to use the
regulatory language that was repealed.
Except where otherwise noted, recipients are not
required to use this
language, and may use their own
language as long as it meets
regulatory requirements.
Thus, while it is reasonable to use the collateral attack doctrine to preclude a later attack on issues directly related to the particular
regulatory decision (e.g. the consultation issues in this matter), the doctrine surely can not be used to
require a party to raise issues «upstream» of the
regulatory matter in question (on the
language of upstream in this context see Skeetchestn et al v Registrar of Land Titles, 2000 BCSC 118, aff'd 2000 BCCA 525).
The paper's analysis of changes ends on July 1, 2012, and the government has also introduced
regulatory changes to the Federal Skilled Worker Program which would prefer younger applicants, create new minimum
language standards, reduce points of international work experience, and
require third - party credential assessments.