Sentences with phrase «reign without»

Even though he owned 42 % of the stock and Seward owned 42 % of the stock, Robert wanted majority voting power so he could reign without contest.

She knew if she didn't stand up to her family right away, her chance to reign without a regent and family control would be lost.

Even though he owned 42 % of the stock and Seward owned 42 % of the stock, Robert wanted majority voting power so he could reign without contest.

All evil is banished and blessedness reigns without qualification.

However, fear reigns without reason or knowledge of what really needs fear.

Leave the inner critic at the door and dive into Anarchy Reigns without cynicism.

Not exact matches

Contrary to popular belief, the fact that someone has entered your property without permission does not grant you free reign to deal with them as you see fit.

While Facebook is wise to scrutinize apps pulling in lots of user data, doing so without warning or even an announcement is how Facebook hurt its relationships with developers circa 2009 as it tried to rapidly reign in spammy virality.

Confusion reigns in one corner of Brisbane's challenged apartment market, with a marketer offering discounts of up to 39 per cent — apparently without authorisation — in a newly completed residential development.

It's proven time and again that cash is, without a doubt, a great way to reign in your spending.

For now, he continues to reign over those who are without Christ.

Instead, he always likened reason and philosophy to the law of Moses, a law that does not lose one jot or tittle in the Logos: the Taboric Light that enlightens all of creation, and without whom darkness and chaos would ultimately reign.

If we revolutionaries are only allowed to use a little violence (you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs), you'll see the reign of justice, liberty, and equality.»

However, the greatness of Christianity was first manifest when its founders, utterly convinced of the imminent end of the world, «gave free reign to their absolute ethical intuitions respecting ideal possibilities without a thought of the preservation of society» (AI 16).

(hint: read 1 Cor 15:24 - 28 without bringing your preconceived notion of The Father ending Jesus» mediatorial reign and inaugurating his kingly reign).

The first stage, that of expansion, began shortly after the death of Jesus Christ at Jerusalem in the reign of Tiberius, and went on without interruption for about thirty years.

In summary then, when Jesus says in Matthew 22:14 that «many are called, but few are chosen,» He is not laying out the doctrine of Unconditional Election, but is saying that when God invites all to participate with Him in His rule and reign on earth, He does so without partiality or favoritism.

Without a prophet who speaks authoritatively the will of God, only confusion can reign as people argue what God meant and uninspired men tamper with the holy scriptures!

According to one view, there would be no agent at all: God would directly, without any intermediary, set up his kingdom and would himself reign.

Joash reigned, unfortunately without distinction, to the end of the century (c. 837 - 800) Like Jehu and Jehoahaz, in Israel, he suffered bitterly from the ruthless aggression of Hazael of Syria.

O Lord Jesus Christ, Who said to Your Apostles: «Peace I leave with you, My peace I give to you,» regard not my sins but the faith of Your Church, and deign to give her peace and unity according to Your Will: Who live and reign, God, world without end.

Chapter 14 concludes what the narrator obviously regards as the most significant episode in a seven - year span of David's mature reign (see 13:23, «after two full years»; 13:38, «Absalom [was in Geshur] three years»; 14:28, «Absalom dwelt two full years in Jerusalem, without coming into the king's presence») These seven years have been compressed and unified into a single event.

Without ever knowing quite why it works this way, we only know that we, who ought to be abandoned by God for our perverse misreading of God's reign, never will be because Jesus was abandoned in our stead.

It is not only reigning, but it is without a rival.

From my personal experience it seems that without going to church people stray off the path and their own ideas of church reign.

He was succeeded by William and Mary, during whose reign the so - called «Toleration Act» affirmed the position of the Church of England, but, without removing any of their civil disabilities, allowed Dissenters freedom of worship.

After the Firstborn of the Father, while yet a spirit being, had gained power and intelligence that made him like unto God; after he had become, under the Father, the Creator of worlds without number; after he had reigned on the throne of eternal power as the Lord Omnipotent — after all this he yet had to gain a mortal and then an immortal body.

In the midst of the reign of death God did not leave himself without witness.

My French and Chinese friends sometimes tell me that piri - piri and spice cooking are ruinous to a sensitive palate, and boast that they have created the world's two reigning academies of cuisine without recourse to such extremes in the kitchen.»

Harden, the reigning sixth man of the year, is also eligible for an extension and without one will be a restricted free agent following next season.

Styles proved that he can take Reigns to his absolute limit — with or without any help — and Reigns proved he can hang with the best talent in the world.

It would give the crowd a reason to boo Reigns, and when he's this version of Reigns who doesn't give a single thought to what the crowd thinks, the Reigns who has a harder edge around him and starts showing off his darker side without fully succumbing, he's the best version of himself.

The fact WWE let him look like a superhero without it being at the expense of Owens or his title also helps, and Braun Strowman looked like a terrifying, unstoppable force by taking Reigns down.

The 56 - year - old has largely worked with squads of players superior to this Liverpool one, but he played a large part in building that famous Milan side that won the European Cup twice under his reign, and also took a declining Chelsea side to a new level without any real signings of his own, showing how much influence he can have over a team's style of play.

So it must have been hard for Henry to give his opinion on what has happened and is happening to the reigning champions Chelsea, without gloating or bursting out laughing, but the Arsenal legend just about managed it when questioned about it by Sky Sports.

can u ever write an article without mocking arsene or wishing his reign to come to an end it is ok sometimes but every time come on man give it a break on to our defence there are only 2 games in this season where team's overall defensive performance can be taken to doubt first was pool because of both first team defenders out second is olympiakos where u can point to team not defending so well on corner that also was actually an individual mistake by ospina which changed the game so our defence is doing good job give credit where it is due of course it would be interesting to see whether we can contain the most inform team in Europe.

Reigning Mexican champions Club America travelled to Monterrey today for their tie against Rayados, but did so without their goalkeeper Moises Muñoz or their star striker Oribe Peralta.

Also, the Aggies still do very well, but without «come play for a 10 - win team with the reigning Heisman winner» as a closing pitch, a top - 10 247 Composite class is not in the cards.

How else are we supposed to see the predictions of doom and gloom from the football pundit and former Gunner after the current Arsenal team, or more honestly squad because Wenger had to do without some key players like Alexis Sanchez, Koscielny, Ozil and Ramsey at Wembley, produced a fine performance to lift the first trophy of the season at the expense of Antonio Conte and his reigning title holders.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Team Apuli was still without their QB Michael Glink in this one and so Captain Justin would assume the reigns.

Does Arsene Wenger realise that his CV is no longer attractive in Europe.He is probably the biggest coach without a league title in 13 years, no European title in 20 years reign, never beaten JM in about 14 league.

With arsenal still just taking the first few steps on the road to recovery after suffering the worst period the team has had to endure for many a year and setting a few unwanted records for the Arsene Wenger era, we could probably have done without this midweek game against a side that is not only the reigning Premier League champions but who are quite a bit further down their own road to redemption while still needing some points to make their survival in the top flight completely secure.

His departure was not without drama, so you should expect to hear boos reigning down when Osweiler returns to Denver on Monday night.

Injuries continue to hamper the reigning Premier League champs, with Sir Alex still without a number of key personnel, particularly in the spine of the team.

The reigning champions moved up to top spot when Chizoba Amaefule headed home in the 77th minute to settle a largely uneventful contest, as United made it five home games without conceding this term.

Since taking the managerial reigns in north London, Wenger has won three Premier League titles, including leading «The Invincibles» side that completed the entire 2003/04 term without tasting defeat, and six FA Cups.

City has gone three competitive games without a win after that incredible 10 games winning streak at the start of Guardiola's reign.

This season they have yet to lose, winning five of nine, and have even reigned supreme in four of their previous five league encounters at the Stadium of Light, all of which were without conceding.

Fading fast, too, are the chances of ascribing individual criminal responsibility to the patrons of such crimes, who are given a far too liberal reign to reshape the borders and histories of entire nations without the necessary scrutiny called for by a fragile human conscience and a full and impartial review mandated by law.